LLAW’s All Things Nuclear #711, Saturday, (08/03/2024)

“End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity”

Lloyd A. Williams-Pendergraft

Aug 04, 2024

1

Share

Holtec Palisades - Holtec International

The Holtec International Mothballed Nuclear Generating Station in Michigan

LLAW’s NUCLEAR ISSUES & COMMENTS, Saturday, (08/03/2024)

This is where politics and reality don’t mix, but rather cast a shadow over human life versus capitalism and insane carelessness. There is an old saying that applies here — something like “You can’t teach an old dog new tricks”. But you should, if you are thoughtful and considerate, just accept the fact that the dog is old and leave him be.

We are naively treating the concept of more nuclear energy like it’s an old friend, which it never has been, and never will be. And it will be the death of us , if nuclear war doesn’t accomplish it first, or add nuclear power to the war process, along with a little boost from CO2, the triad can end it all soon, or we can choose our poison, and it will happen by one or the other sooner or later. It seems there is no way out; but we don’t have to hasten the process. ~llaw

Reuters Logo and symbol, meaning, history, PNG, brand

US nuclear plant unfit for quick resurrection, former lead engineer says

By Timothy Gardner

August 2, 202410:49 AM PDT Updated a day ago

WASHINGTON, Aug 2 (Reuters) – The first U.S. nuclear plant to ever try reopening after undergoing preparations for permanent closure is not fit to restart anytime soon because it sidestepped important safety work for years before retirement, a former official at the reactor said.

Power company Entergy (ETR.N), opens new tab closed the Palisades reactor in Michigan in 2022, after the plant generated electricity for more than 50 years. Privately-held Holtec International bought Palisades shortly after and has since secured a $1.52 billion conditional U.S. loan guarantee to restart. Holtec seeks to open the plant in about a year.

The fate of Palisades is closely watched by the nuclear industry as at least two other shuttered plants, including a unit at Constellation Energy’s (CEG.O), opens new tab Three Mile Island, consider reopening.

The administration of President Joe Biden sees nuclear power as a critical tool in the fight against climate change and supports efforts to restart closed plants, delay retirements of existing ones, and speed permitting for new projects.

“I’m pro-nuclear, but they selected the wrong horse to ride to town on,” said Alan Blind, who was engineering director at the Palisades plant from 2006 to 2013 under Entergy.

Blind said the plant got exemptions from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the nuclear safety regulator, allowing it to fall short of safety design standards that more modern plants must adhere to because it was nearing retirement.

Those safety standards include prevention of cooling systems being clogged by the breakdown of insulation on pipes, defense against earthquakes, and reduction of risks to fires, Blind said, adding he had been monitoring the plants’ exemption requests since his retirement.

“I’m worried that the NRC will not insist that the generic safety issues be the fixed before they allow Palisades to restart,” Blind told Reuters.

Scott Burnell, an NRC spokesperson, said the safety review of Holtec’s applications “will include examining how Holtec plans to follow through on technical issues, such as what Mr. Blind describes, that were unresolved when the plant shut down in 2022.”

“Those plans will be public to the greatest extent possible,” and the NRC will allow a restart only if Holtec meets safety and environmental requirements. Burnell added NRC will soon offer an opportunity to offer legal challenges to Holtec’s requests to restart, a standard procedure.

Holtec believes Palisades can restart in about a year within the NRC’s existing regulatory framework, said spokesperson Pat O’Brien. “As part of the repowering, Palisades will undergo extensive inspections, testing, maintenance, system and equipment upgrades and modifications to ensure the continuation of safe and reliable operation throughout the plant’s extended operational life,” O’Brien said.

Entergy supports the effort to re-open Palisades, said spokesperson Mark Sullivan. He did comment on Blind’s concerns about safety standards at the plant.

Entergy shut Palisades in May 2022, two weeks ahead of schedule over a glitch with a control rod, despite a $6 billion federal program to save nuclear plants suffering from rising costs and competition from natural gas and renewable energy.

The Biden administration’s Loan Programs Office at the Department of Energy issued Holtec a conditional $1.52 billion loan guarantee in March to restart Palisades.

The LPO referred questions to the NRC.

The Reuters Power Up newsletter provides everything you need to know about the global energy industry. Sign up here.

Reporting by Timothy Gardner, Editing by Nick Zieminski

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Purchase Licensing Rights

Timothy Gardner

Thomson Reuters

Timothy reports on energy and environment policy and is based in Washington, D.C. His coverage ranges from the latest in nuclear power, to environment regulations, to U.S. sanctions and geopolitics. He has been a member of three teams in the past two years that have won Reuters best journalism of the year awards. As a cyclist he is happiest outside.Subscribe

ABOUT THE FOLLOWING ACCESS TO “LLAW’S ALL THINGS NUCLEAR” RELATED MEDIA:

There are 7 categories, with the latest (#7) being a Friday weekly roundup of IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) global nuclear news stories. Also included is a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcanic and caldera activity around the world that play an important role in humanity’s lives. The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). The Categories are listed below in their usual order:

  1. All Things Nuclear
  2. Nuclear Power
  3. Nuclear Power Emergencies
  4. Nuclear War
  5. Nuclear War Threats
  6. Yellowstone Caldera (Note: There no Yellowstone Caldera bonus stories available in this evening’s Post.)
  7. IAEA Weekly News (Friday’s only)

Whenever there is an underlined link to a Category media news story, if you press or click on the link provided, you no longer have to cut and paste to your web browser, since this Post’s link will take you directly to the article in your browser.

A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.

TODAY’S NUCLEAR WORLD’S NEWS, Saturday, (08/03/2024)

All Things Nuclear

NEWS

Nuclear war threat again? | CNN Politics

CNN

Nuclear war threat again? 05:43 ; ‘I’ve lost everything‘: Woman speaks after losing son, grandchild in landslide. 01:56 ; Is this dolphin spotted in …

Here’s how Point Beach Nuclear Plant fared in its latest safety inspections

AOL.com

“And when all of a sudden we talk about using nuclear weapons in the Taiwan Strait, we are very clearly blurring the commitments we have made.

TVA’s biggest nuclear plant turns 50 | Chattanooga Times Free Press

Chattanooga Times Free Press

Browns Ferry generates up to 3,954 megawatts of electricity, or about 20% of all of TVA’s power, and supplies enough power for more than 2 million …

Nuclear Power

NEWS

see how the new technology could change the future of nuclear power – Yahoo

Yahoo

Other notable nuclear energy projects include a nuclear power plant being built in Wyoming on the site of a retired coal plant, which drastically …

Nuclear Energy would get slight boost in ’25 Senate appropriations bill; waste account whole

ExchangeMonitor

… Reactor Concepts RD&D, Advanced Fuels and Front End Fuel Cycle: areas that broadly focus on future technology for new nuclear power plants. The …

US nuclear plant unfit for quick resurrection, former lead engineer says – Reuters

Reuters

The first U.S. nuclear plant to ever try reopening after undergoing preparations for permanent closure is not fit to restart anytime soon because …

Nuclear Power Emergencies

NEWS

Florida flooding emergency declared as tropical threat draws near – WPRI-TV

WPRI-TV

Florida flooding emergency declared as tropical threat draws near … Do you support or oppose the development of more nuclear power plants in the US?

Nuclear War

NEWS

Nuclear war threat again? | CNN Politics

CNN

nuclear war is as dangerous to civilization…. as the incoming asteroid was to the dinosaurs, 66 million years ago – a civilization-ending event,” …

Russian CEO Reveals New ‘Doomsday Drone’ to Use in Nuclear War – Newsweek

Newsweek

Amid escalating nuclear threats, Russia has developed a “doomsday drone” in preparation for potential nuclear attack scenarios, a top executive of …

Banning Sadako Won’t Keep Kids Safe from Nuclear War – LA Progressive

LA Progressive

The story of Sadako Sasaki tells the true story of a 12-year-old girl who survived the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima as a toddler. Why ban it?

Nuclear War Threats

NEWS

Russian CEO Reveals New ‘Doomsday Drone’ to Use in Nuclear War – Newsweek

Newsweek

Amid escalating nuclear threats, Russia has developed a “doomsday drone” in preparation for potential nuclear attack scenarios, a top executive of …

What is Russia’s ‘nuclear doctrine’? – VOA News

VOA News

On the first day of the war, Putin said “whoever tries to impede us, let alone create threats for our country and its people, must know that the …

Army Intel Report Cites New Long-Range Chinese Missile Threats to US Homeland

Warrior Maven

… threats likely being watched closely by the Pentagon. Certainly … attack is never mistaken for a nuclear strike. It is possible the PRC 

LLAW’s All Things Nuclear #710, Friday, (08/02/2024)

“End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity”

Lloyd A. Williams-Pendergraft

Aug 02, 2024

1

Share

Nuclear power plant.jpg

LLAW’s NUCLEAR ISSUES & COMMENTS, Friday, (08/02/2024)

Don’t forget to check out the AIEA weekly news at the end of the nuclear news categories. There is always a lot of information from their nuclear news stories, but the most important one, at least for now, is the weekly update concerning the status of the radiation and other dangerous issues of the ZNPP in the middle of the Russia/Ukraine war . . . Here us an introduction to this weeks Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant ZNPP up date:

The water level in the cooling pond at Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) continues to decrease. Despite all reactors remaining in a state of cold-shutdown, availability of this water is important for nuclear safety of the plant, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said today.

But my other concern is the soon-to-be, enforced by Congress, restraints on the NRC for all new nuclear power plants, and a general relaxation of controls on existing ones. This is a serious situation that will lead to serious mistakes from modelling, engineering, design, construction, and operations of nuclear power plants. It is a thoughtless ‘crime’ that this leniency has become law, codified by politicians who know nothing about nuclear energy and even less about the unholy propaganda of the nuclear industry. We cannot allow these foolish irresponsible mistakes to continue to be made for nothing more than our constant ‘guiding light’, which is, of course. money. ~llaw (Read on.)New law expands nuclear power, but some question potential safety hazards (From Advantage News

  • Kevin Bessler for Advantage News
  • The nuclear power industry recently received a boost with a bill that allows expansion, but not everyone is on board.

President Joe Biden signed the ADVANCE Act, which stands for Accelerating Deployment of Versatile, Advanced Nuclear for Clean Energy. The act is intended to help speed up the deployment and licensing of new reactors and fuels. The legislation also promotes development of small modular nuclear reactors, or SMRs.

Supporters said energy demand is expected to grow over the next decade as electric vehicles, data centers and AI-related operations all search for a reliable source of power.

The ADVANCE Act also directs the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to reduce certain licensing application fees and authorizes increased staffing for NRC reviews to expedite the process.   

Illinois has the largest number of nuclear power reactors in operation in the country, with 11 nuclear reactors located at six different nuclear power plants. A recent Illinois law repealed a nuclear moratorium, which could clear the way for new nuclear plants in the form of SMRs.

David Kraft, director of the Illinois-based Nuclear Energy Information Service, said the act provides less regulatory oversight by ordering the NRC to streamline the licensing process.

“In science you don’t prejudge the outcome, you gather the data, you examine it and tear it apart and come up with a conclusion,” said Kraft. “Here they’re starting the other way around by saying we’re going to have nuclear power, downplay all the public outcry if there is any or any kind of negativity that would cast any doubt on the benefits of nuclear power. That’s just ridiculous.”

Kraft said the law ignores the potential increased risk and harm from having more nuclear reactors large and small, and produces more high-level radioactive waste without first having a disposal method in place for either current or future reactors.

Another development in this bill is its focus on small reactor technologies, known as microreactors. These compact reactors will be small enough to fit on a semi-truck and can be deployed around the country, including remote locations and military bases. The ADVANCE Act directs the NRC to develop guidance to license and regulate microreactor designs within 18 months.

“Nuclear power plays an important role in producing carbon-free power for our electric grid, and now our nuclear industry will have the framework it needs to strengthen America’s energy leadership,” said House Energy and Commerce Committee member U.S. Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr., D-New Jersey.Subscribe

ABOUT THE FOLLOWING ACCESS TO “LLAW’S ALL THINGS NUCLEAR” RELATED MEDIA:

There are 7 categories, with the latest (#7) being a Friday weekly roundup of IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) global nuclear news stories. Also included is a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcanic and caldera activity around the world that play an important role in humanity’s lives. The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). The Categories are listed below in their usual order:

  1. All Things Nuclear
  2. Nuclear Power
  3. Nuclear Power Emergencies
  4. Nuclear War
  5. Nuclear War Threats
  6. Yellowstone Caldera (Note: There are two Yellowstone Caldera bonus stories available in this evening’s Post.)
  7. IAEA Weekly News (Friday’s only)

Whenever there is an underlined link to a Category media news story, if you press or click on the link provided, you no longer have to cut and paste to your web browser, since this Post’s link will take you directly to the article in your browser.

A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.

TODAY’S NUCLEAR WORLD’S NEWS, Friday, (08/02/2024)

All Things Nuclear

NEWS

CDT Europe’s AI Bulletin: Summer 2024 – – Center for Democracy and Technology

– Center for Democracy and Technology

Policymakers in Europe are hard at work on all things artificial intelligence, and we’re here to keep you updated. … Nuclear Research (CERN) …

Nuclear verdicts and their impact on trucking | Commercial Carrier Journal

Commercial Carrier Journal

So anytime we talk about nuclear verdict, that’s what we mean. … And those five states that I mentioned accounted for more than half of all of the …

America May Soon Face a Fateful Choice About Iran – The New York Times

The New York Times

Once forged, this would mean that all of America’s Middle East allies would be operating as a counter-Iranian team — Jordan, Egypt, the U.A.E., Israel …

Nuclear Power

NEWS

New law expands nuclear power, but some question potential safety hazards | Local News

AdVantageNews.com

The nuclear power industry recently received a boost with a bill that allows expansion, but not everyone is on board.

Sweden, USA agree to nuclear cooperation

World Nuclear News

The MoU was signed by Sweden’s Minister for Energy, Business and Industry Ebba Busch and US Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm in Washington, DC, …

United States and Ghana Launch Africa’s First Nuclear Energy Training Hub

Department of Energy

U.S. Department of Energy’s Aleshia Duncan and Ghana Atomic Energy Commission’s Samuel Boakye Dampare sign a statement of intent to launch the …

Nuclear Power Emergencies

NEWS

Belarusian MFA comments on UN Security Council’s emergency meeting – BELTA

BELTA

NUCLEAR POWER IN BELARUS AND WORLDWIDE. President of the Republic of Belarus · The Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus · The Council of …

Nuclear War

NEWS

Putin, Xi’s Nuclear Arsenal Scaring Biden? US Reveals Desperate Move To Race Ahead In …

YouTube

A top U.S. Official has said that Washington may reassess its nuclear arsenal & posture. This is because of the nuclear prowess of Russia, …

Nuclear Threats and the Role of Allies”: Remarks by Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense …

Department of Defense

While the Administration has long sought to strike a balance between deterrence and arms control, we now find ourselves in nothing short of a new …

Nuclear Threats and the Role of Allies: A Conversation with Acting Assistant Secretary Vipin Narang

CSIS

The CSIS Project on Nuclear Issues hosted Dr. Vipin Narang, Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space Policy, to discuss nuclear threats and …

Nuclear War Threats

NEWS

Nuclear Threats and the Role of Allies”: Remarks by Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense …

Department of Defense

… nuclear threats and nuclear war, Moscow was courting nuclear risk and threatening escalation. Meanwhile, we learned that Russia is developing a …

Pentagon Reveals New Nuclear Weapons Strategy Over Russia-China Threat – Newsweek

Newsweek

“All of us should be concerned with the prospect of Russia putting a nuclear weapon in space, posing a threat to satellites operated by countries and …

Nuclear Threats and the Role of Allies: A Conversation with Acting Assistant Secretary Vipin Narang

CSIS

… nuclear threats and nuclear war, Moscow was courting nuclear risk and threatening escalation. … nuclear risks – additional risks in the nuclear

Yellowstone Caldera

NEWS

65th Anniv. — M7.3 Hebgen Lake Quake (Yellowstone Monthly Update – Aug 2024) – YouTube

YouTube

… Caldera Chronicles — https://www.usgs.gov/volcanoes/yellowstone/caldera-chronicles?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=usgs-main&utm_campaign=nh …

IAEA Weekly News

2 August 2024

Read the top news and updates published on IAEA.org this week.

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_165x110/public/iaeaflag11140x640.jpg?itok=L8JFAU_6

2 August 2024

Update 240 – IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine

The water level in the cooling pond at Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) continues to decrease. Despite all reactors remaining in a state of cold-shutdown, availability of this water is important for nuclear safety of the plant, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said today. Read more →

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_165x110/public/onkalo-entrance-1140x640.jpg?itok=kDEbQq-S

1 August 2024

Verifying Spent Nuclear Fuel in Deep Geological Repositories

Deep geological repositories present challenges and opportunities for the application of safeguards, and innovative solutions are being developed so that IAEA safeguards inspectors can verify the stored nuclear material.  Read more →

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_165x110/public/adobestock486859150.jpeg?itok=FJvL5rmB

31 July 2024

New Radiopharmacy Database: Enhancing Development, Collaboration and Research

A new IAEA radiopharmacy database will facilitate research, collaboration and the sustainability of safe radiopharmaceuticals for clinical use Read more →

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_165x110/public/norwenncayagopanganibanphilippines-1140x640.jpg?itok=4Eld0L6w

30 July 2024

Strength in Diversity: The Impact of the IAEA’s Work

Experts and professionals worldwide share how their work with the IAEA has enhanced their expertise and nuclear security in their countries, keeping pace with the expansion of peaceful uses of nuclear science and technology to meet development goals. Read more →

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_165x110/public/peru-impact-review-team-1140x640.jpg?itok=7Hzi4t3N

29 July 2024

Peru Takes Steps Towards its Goal of Universal Health Care for Cancer Patients

Peru is advancing towards its goal of delivering universal health care to all cancer patients, with the decentralisation of cancer services now well underway and its second National Cancer Control Plan nearing completion. Read more →

LLAW’s All Things Nuclear #709, Thursday, (08/01/2024)

“End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity”

Lloyd A. Williams-Pendergraft

Aug 02, 2024

1

Share

Hiroshima after the atomic bomb

Photograph of Hiroshima after the atomic bomb. (National Archives Identifier 22345671)

LLAW’s NUCLEAR ISSUES & COMMENTS, Thursday, (08/01/2024)

Will we ever have nuclear disarmament? Only after we have used them all up in a nuclear WWIII and there is virtually no one left on planet Earth, and little other life as well. So arguing in vain for disarmament is an admirable, valiant and humanitarian thing to do, but those deranged power/war-mongers who control the rest of us have other thoughts about ‘all things nuclear’ that has nothing to do with getting rid of them in a world-wide peaceful way.

So disarmament can never happen unless the human social world somehow has an unheard of change of heart (forget about that), or someone(s) come along and takes our ‘nuclear toys’ away from us and rids the planet of ‘all things nuclear’ themselves, but doing so may mean that those someone(s) only want to save Mother Earth and her life-giving world for themselves. Why would they want to include us after what we’ve already done added to what we are threatening to do to ourselves now?

Otherwise, life and planet Earth, as we have known it will die a horrible death at humanity’s own hands. To me, it is very strange way to commit mass suicide, but those who have the power to play ‘nuclear football’ will likely do so, and all it will take is one fumble from one quarterback for us all to lose the game we call humankind.

Please read the following article and reflect on what we Americans did to innocent citizens of Japan on two days in early August of 1945 in order to end WWII, and realize what a planet-full of hundreds of times more powerful nuclear bombs could and would do to the entire world if the ‘next time around’ comes around . . . ~llaw

globalissues.org

Social, Political, Economic and Environmental Issues That Affect Us All

79 Years After Hiroshima & Nagasaki: A Grim Reminder of Nuclear Annihilation

Erico Platt looks at the disarmament exhibition that she staged, “Three Quarters of a Century After Hiroshima and Nagasaki: The Hibakusha—Brave Survivors Working for a Nuclear-Free World.” Credit: UNODA/Diane Barnes
  • by Thalif Deen (united nations)
  • Thursday, August 01, 2024
  • Inter Press Service

UNITED NATIONS, Aug 01 (IPS) – The upcoming 79th anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which took place on August 6 and 9, 1945, remains a grim reminder of the destructive consequences of nuclear weapons.

The US bombings killed an estimated 90,000 to 210,000, with roughly half of the deaths occurring on the first day in Hiroshima.

But despite an intense global campaign for nuclear disarmament, the world has witnessed an increase in the number of nuclear powers from five—the US, UK, France, China and Russia—to nine, including India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel.

Is the continued worldwide anti-nuclear campaign an exercise in futility? And will the rising trend continue—with countries such as Iran, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and South Korea—as potential nuclear powers of the future?

South Africa is the only country that has voluntarily given up nuclear weapons after developing them. In the 1980s, South Africa produced six nuclear weapons, but dismantled them between 1989 and 1993. A number of factors may have influenced South Africa’s decision, including national security, international relations, and a desire to avoid becoming a pariah state.

But there is an equally valid argument that there have been no nuclear wars—only threats—largely because of the success of the world-wide anti-nuclear campaign, the role of the United Nations and the collective action by most of the 193 member states in adopting several anti-nuclear treaties.

According to the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA), the United Nations has sought to eliminate weapons  of mass destruction (WMDs) ever since the establishment of the world body. The first resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1946 established a commission to deal with problems related to the discovery of atomic energy, among others.

The commission was to make proposals for, inter alia, the control of atomic energy to the extent necessary to ensure its use only for peaceful purposes.

Several multilateral treaties have since been established with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation and testing, while promoting progress in nuclear disarmament.

These include the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), the Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water, also known as the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), which was signed in 1996 but has yet to enter into force, and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW).

Jackie Cabasso, Executive Director, Western States Legal Foundation in Oakland, California, which monitors and analyzes US nuclear weapons programs and policies, told IPS: “As we approach the 79th anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the world is facing a greater danger of nuclear war than at any time since 1945.”

“The terrifying doctrine of “nuclear deterrence,” which should long ago have been delegitimized and relegated to the dustbin of history and replaced with multilateral, non-militarized common security, has metastasized into a pathological ideology brandished by nuclear-armed states and their allies to justify the perpetual possession and threatened use—including first use—of nuclear weapons,” she pointed out.

“It is more important than ever that we heed the warnings of the aging hibakusha (A-bomb survivors): What happened to us must never be allowed to happen to anyone again; nuclear weapons and human beings cannot co-exist; no more Hiroshimas, no more Nagasakis!”

This demands an irreversible process of nuclear disarmament. But to the contrary, all nuclear armed states are qualitatively and, in some cases, quantitatively upgrading their nuclear arsenals and a new multipolar arms race is underway, she noted.

“To achieve the elimination of nuclear weapons and a global society that is more fair, peaceful, and ecologically sustainable, we will need to move from the irrational fear-based ideology of deterrence to the rational fear of an eventual nuclear weapon use, whether by accident, miscalculation, or design.”

“We will also need to stimulate a rational hope that security can be redefined in humanitarian and ecologically sustainable terms that will lead to the elimination of nuclear weapons and dramatic demilitarization, freeing up tremendous resources desperately needed to address universal human needs and protect the environment.”

In this time of multiple global crises, “our work for the elimination of nuclear weapons must take place in a much broader framework, taking into account the interface between nuclear and conventional weapons and militarism in general, the humanitarian and long-term environmental consequences of nuclear war, and the fundamental incompatibility of nuclear weapons with democracy, the rule of law, and human wellbeing,” declared Cabasso.

Dr. M.V. Ramana, Professor and Simons Chair in Disarmament, Global and Human Security School of Public Policy and Global Affairs and Graduate Program Director, MPPGA at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, told IPS, “The glass is half-full or half-empty depending on how one looks at it.”

“The fact that we have avoided nuclear war since 1945 is also partly due to the persistence of the anti-nuclear movement. Historians like Lawrence Wittner have pointed to the many instances when governments have chosen nuclear restraint instead of unrestrained expansion.”

While South Africa is the only country that dismantled its entire nuclear weapons program, many countries—Sweden, for example—have chosen not to develop nuclear weapons even though they had the technical capacity to do so. They did so in part because of strong public opposition to nuclear weapons, which in turn is due to social movements supporting nuclear disarmament, he pointed out.

Thus, organizing for nuclear disarmament is not futile. Especially as we move into another era of conflicts between major powers, such movements will be critical to our survival, declared Ramana.

According to the UN, a group of elderly hibakusha, called Nihon Hidankyo, have dedicated their lives to achieving a non-proliferation treaty, which they hope will ultimately lead to a total ban on nuclear weapons.

“On an overcrowded train on the Hakushima line, I fainted for a while, holding in my arms my eldest daughter of one year and six months. I regained my senses at her cries and found no one else was on the train,” a 34-year-old woman testifies in the booklet. She was located just two kilometres from the Hiroshima epicenter.

Fleeing to her relatives in Hesaka, at age 24, another woman remembers that “people, with the skin dangling down, were stumbling along. They fell down with a thud and died one after another,” adding, “still now I often have nightmares about this, and people say, ‘it’s neurosis’.”

One man who entered Hiroshima after the bomb recalled in the exhibition “that dreadful scene—I cannot forget even after many decades.”

At a disarmament exhibition in UN Headquarters in New York, a visitor reads text about a young boy bringing his little brother to a cremation site in Nagasaki, Japan. Credit: UNODA/Erico Platt
At a disarmament exhibition in UN Headquarters in New York, a visitor reads text about a young boy bringing his little brother to a cremation site in Nagasaki, Japan. Credit: UNODA/Erico Platt

A woman who was 25 years old at the time said, “When I went outside, it was dark as night. Then it got brighter and brighter, and I could see burnt people crying and running about in utter confusion. It was hell…I found my neighbor trapped under a fallen concrete wall… Only half of his face was showing. He was burned alive”.

The steadfast conviction of the Hidankyo remains: “Nuclear weapons are absolute evil that cannot coexist with humans. There is no choice but to abolish them.”

Addressing the UN Security Council last March, Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that with geopolitical tensions escalating the risk of nuclear warfare to its highest point in decades, reducing and abolishing nuclear weapons is the only viable path to saving humanity.

“There is one path—and one path only—that will vanquish this senseless and suicidal shadow once and for all.  We need disarmament now,” he said, urging nuclear-weapon States to re-engage to prevent any use of a nuclear weapon, re-affirm moratoria on nuclear testing and “urgently agree that none of them will be the first to use nuclear weapons.”

He called for reductions in the number of nuclear weapons led by the holders of the largest arsenals—the United States and the Russian Federation—to “find a way back to the negotiating table” to fully implement the New Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, or START Treaty, and agree on its successor.

“When each country pursues its own security without regard for others, we create global insecurity that threatens us all,” he observed.  Almost eight decades after the incineration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, nuclear weapons still represent a clear danger to global peace and security, growing in power, range and stealth.”

“States possessing them are absent from the negotiating table, and some statements have raised the prospect of unleashing nuclear hell—threats that we must all denounce with clarity and force,” he said.  Moreover, emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and cyber and outer space domains have created new risks.”

From Pope Francis, who calls the possession of nuclear arms “immoral”, to the hibakusha, the brave survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to Hollywood, where Oppenheimer brought the harsh reality of nuclear doomsday to vivid life for millions around the world, people are calling for an end to the nuclear madness.  “Humanity cannot survive a sequel to Oppenheimer,” he warned.

When Nagasaki marked the 78th anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombing of the city last year, the mayor Shiro Suzuki, urged world powers to abolish nuclear weapons, saying nuclear deterrence also increases risks of nuclear war, according to an Associated Press (AP) report.

He called on the Group of Seven (G7) industrial powers to adopt a separate document on nuclear disarmament that called for using nuclear weapons as deterrence.

“Now is the time to show courage and make the decision to break free from dependence on nuclear deterrence,” Suzuki said in his peace declaration. “As long as states are dependent on nuclear deterrence, we cannot realize a world without nuclear weapons.”

Russia’s nuclear threat has encouraged other nuclear states to accelerate their dependence on nuclear weapons or enhance capabilities, further increasing the risk of nuclear war, and that Russia is not the only one representing the risk of nuclear deterrence, Suzuki said.

Suzuki, whose parents were hibakusha, or survivors of the Nagasaki attack, said knowing the reality of the atomic bombings is the starting point for achieving a world without nuclear weapons. He said the survivors’ testimonies are a true deterrent against nuclear weapons use, the AP report said.

This article is brought to you by IPS Noram, in collaboration with INPS Japan and Soka Gakkai International, in consultative status with UN ECOSOC.

IPS UN Bureau ReportSubscribe

ABOUT THE FOLLOWING ACCESS TO “LLAW’S ALL THINGS NUCLEAR” RELATED MEDIA:

There are 7 categories, with the latest (#7) being a Friday weekly roundup of IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) global nuclear news stories. Also included is a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcanic and caldera activity around the world that play an important role in humanity’s lives. The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). The Categories are listed below in their usual order:

  1. All Things Nuclear
  2. Nuclear Power
  3. Nuclear Power Emergencies
  4. Nuclear War
  5. Nuclear War Threats
  6. Yellowstone Caldera (Note: There is one Yellowstone Caldera bonus story available in this evening’s Post.)
  7. IAEA Weekly News (Friday’s only)

Whenever there is an underlined link to a Category media news story, if you press or click on the link provided, you no longer have to cut and paste to your web browser, since this Post’s link will take you directly to the article in your browser.

A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.

TODAY’S NUCLEAR WORLD’S NEWS, Thursday, (08/01/2024)

All Things Nuclear

NEWS

Experts say nuclear energy bill is proof of bipartisan consensus – The Hill

The Hill

… things.” Maria Korsnick, CEO at the Nuclear Energy Institute … all Hill.TV See all Video. Top Stories. See All · Senate · Trump splits with …

British nuclear missile submarine fires new torpedo – UK Defence Journal

UK Defence Journal

What happened to supercavitating torpedos that were supposed to make everything instantly obsolete? Reply.

Russia begins third round of drills to train troops in tactical nuclear weapons

Jefferson City News Tribune

About Us · Contact Us · Subscribe · Advertise · Terms of Use · Commercial Printing. Copyright © 2024, News Tribune Publishing. All rights reserved.

Nuclear Power

NEWS

Experts say nuclear energy bill is proof of bipartisan consensus – The Hill

The Hill

The recent passage of major legislation to boost the deployment of nuclear reactors is evidence of a bipartisan consensus on nuclear power as an …

Uranium Fever – Small Modular Reactors Could Be Part of Nuclear Revival, But Hurdles Remain

RBN Energy

The steam is used to spin large turbines that drive electric generators to produce electricity (see dashed red oval). Large nuclear power plants …

Watch Live: The Nuclear Frontier, Securing America’s Energy Future – The Hill

The Hill

America’s energy future is shining a little brighter after the recent passage of the bipartisan ADVANCE Act to bolster U.S. nuclear power …

Nuclear Power Emergencies

NEWS

CenterPoint under fire for $800 million spend intended for mobile generators

Power Engineering

Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick said the massive, more expensive generators purchased by CenterPoint Energy could not be used in nearly all emergencies …

Myanmar’s military regime extends state of emergency by 6 months as civil war rages

WATE

… power in Myanmar 3 1/2 years ago on Wednesday extended the state of … nuclear reactor ‘Hermes’ … Gas station clerk stole $1 million lottery …

Myanmar junta extends emergency rule amid escalating conflict – The Star

The Star

The military put the country under emergency rule for a year when it took power … Talen Energy offers up nuclearpowered crypto mining campus stake, ..

Nuclear War

NEWS

Military begins 3rd round of drills to train troops amid Western threats – YouTube

YouTube

37:17 · Go to channel. The Tanks Winning and Losing The War in Ukraine | War On Tape | Season 1 Marathon | Daily Mail … “After the Big One: Nuclear …

Russian forces test installing dummy warheads as part of nuclear drills – Reuters

Reuters

Russian forces practiced installing special dummy warheads on launch vehicles as part of the third stage of tactic nuclear weapons exercises, …

Exclusive: North Korea wants to restart nuclear talks if Trump wins, says ex-diplomat

Reuters

North Korea wants to reopen nuclear talks with the United States if Donald Trump is re-elected as president and is working to devise a new …

Nuclear War Threats

NEWS

Europe is a major obstacle to nuclear disarmament, latest Nuclear Weapons Ban Monitor warns

International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons

Daniel Högsta, Deputy Director of ICAN, welcomed the report: “Amidst the heightened nuclear threats in the context of the war in Ukraine, the urgency …

The Threat of More War – The New York Times

The New York Times

The Threat of More War. We examine the contradictions in the Middle East … Residents are still suffering the effects of a French nuclear test that …

79 Years After Hiroshima & Nagasaki: A Grim Reminder of Nuclear Annihilation

Global Issues

But there is an equally valid argument that there have been no nuclear wars—only threats … risks of nuclear war, according to an Associated Press (AP)

Yellowstone Caldera

NEWS

Recent explosion could teach us more about the birth and life of geysers in Yellowstone

Idaho Capital Sun

Yellowstone Caldera Chronicles is a weekly column written by scientists and collaborators of the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory. SUPPORT NEWS YOU …

LLAW’s All Things Nuclear #708, Wednesday, (07/31/2024)

“End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity”

Lloyd A. Williams-Pendergraft

Jul 31, 2024

1

Share

The US Energy Department dug an horizontal 25-foot-diameter tunnel under Yucca Mountain to determine its suitability as a geologic repository for the nation’s commercial spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. The project has stalled since the Obama administration attempted to withdraw the license application of the Yucca Mountain project in 2010. (Credit: US Energy Department, via Flickr)

LLAW’s NUCLEAR ISSUES & COMMENTS, Wednesday, (07/31/2024)

This is a story I know very well from its grass roots in the early 1980s, and, please, do not blame former President Obama for the long, long, long, delay that has lasted right up until some tomorrow someday. Yucca Mountain in Nevada was never and never will be (unless we are incredibly ignorant and stupid), for many reasons, not the least of which is that it would have been built on a geologic fault zone, a fact that Congress has spent more than 40 years trying to ignore, and the last I knew, they still are. But Yucca Mountain will never pass muster, and geologists and other earth science professionals have known that since the very beginning.

It was in the summer or fall of 1982 or ‘83, a year or two after I’d resigned from my employer in the nuclear industry, and had just recently, in 1980, started up a new minerals exploration company that absolutely would never include uranium (the radioactive fuel for all nuclear power plants) exploration, research, and development when I was approached by well-known Wyoming entrepreneur, explaining that he had insider confidential information that Nevada’s Yucca Mountain would be the federal government’s choice of the three sites being considered, who wanted my kind of help to claim ownership of all the federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land at and surrounding the Yucca Mountain site, which would soon be highly mineralized property containing untold millions or billions of dollars in reusable nuclear waste, such as plutonium, cesium, and other radioactive residue of that land near Area 51 and Las Vegas. The gentleman had dozens of large surveyed geologic Ozalid blue-print maps where he and his exploration crew had laid out dozens of mining claims that needed to be filed as soon as possible, and that he wanted to create a new corporation and sell stock to finance the entire scheme . . .

Needless to say, I was not interested, and I told him that the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste storage project would never be constructed because the whole concept of the project was impossible to be used as a nuclear waste repository facility because Yucca Mountain itself was a part of a huge fault scarp system and would be subject to not only long-term earthquakes but volcanism as well, and that such ground would never be approved by the U.S. government. Other serious issues came along later as described in the article below.

But, unfortunately, the sad story that follows exposes the ignorance of politicians and some governmental agencies, particularly in Congress and the Energy Department, explaining candidly how and why our nuclear waste still resides in water reservoirs and concrete vaults at all those nuclear power plant sites where the nuclear waste originated. ~llaw

logo footer

Why US nuclear waste policy got stalled. And what to do about it.

By Victor Gilinsky | July 31, 2024

The US Energy Department dug an horizontal 25-foot-diameter tunnel under Yucca Mountain to determine its suitability as a geologic repository for the nation’s commercial spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. The project has stalled since the Obama administration attempted to withdraw the license application of the Yucca Mountain project in 2010. (See the image above to see the huge tunneling machine.)

It is often said—somewhat accusingly—that it isn’t technical issues that stand in the way of siting a US geologic repository for highly radioactive waste, but political and social ones. In fact, the issues are inextricably connected. The root of the US failure lies in the original motive of the nuclear establishment in siting such an underground repository. It was not to protect public safety, but to protect continued licensing of nuclear power plants from attack in the courts on grounds that there were no provisions for dealing with the plants’ highly radioactive waste.

The disdain for public safety and the rush to open a repository infected the design process and fostered slapdash decisions. These ultimately sank the technical case for the repository at Nevada’s Yucca Mountain. And while in the end the project was shelved by a political act, behind it were Energy Department and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) actions that left a deep residue of public distrust, so deep that there isn’t likely to be a US geologic repository, ever.

The contrast with successful waste repository projects in Sweden and Finland is clear. Their regulatory standards were much tighter than those applied by the NRC, the sites were chosen carefully from a scientific point of view, and the designs strictly focused on public safety. It is not surprising that the Scandinavian authorities were able to gain the confidence of their public, and not just because they took pains to consult the public—which the Energy Department did not. They presented a good case for a sound underground facility.

Waste become a problem. A deep-underground waste repository wasn’t always the preferred solution for dealing with US high-level waste. Before 1975, when the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) was split into the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Energy and Research and Development Administration (ERDA, the forerunner of the Energy Department), the AEC planned to store such waste in an above-ground, so-called “engineered” facility. The new NRC chairman, Bill Anders, a former AEC commissioner, had been spooked by the success of a court challenge to the AEC’s fast breeder project on grounds the commission hadn’t considered the long-term impact of the breeder reactor waste. He was afraid the same argument might stop licensing of conventional power reactors, then (optimistically) projected to soon dominate US electricity generation.

Anders convinced Bob Seamans, the ERDA administrator, to drop the waste storage policy he inherited and adopt deep geological disposal. In 1975, as I was one of the original NRC commissioners, Anders happily told me: “When we put the first fuel assembly underground we can declare victory.” It turned out to be more complicated than that.

The 1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act set up procedures for choosing sites for geologic repositories. The Energy Department was to select potential sites and design a facility that the NRC would review and decide on a license. The department came up with a list of candidate sites from which President Ronald Reagan chose three: in Texas, Washington, and Nevada. In 1987, Congress narrowed the list to Nevada’s Yucca Mountain. The inside-baseball explanation was that the House speaker, Jim Wright, was from Texas, so that was out, and the Democratic majority leader, Tom Foley, was from Washington, so that was out, too.

Perhaps that was too cynical.

Yucca Mountain appeared to be the cheapest site to develop as drilling would be horizontal, from ground level into the mountain, as opposed to drilling down. Unfortunately, it was a very bad site in terms of resisting corrosion of metal waste canisters. It has an oxidizing (rust promoting) chemical environment when the opposite, a reducing environment, was wanted. And the more the Energy Department learned about the site, the worse it looked.

RELATED:

To find a place to store spent nuclear fuel, Congress needs to stop trying to revive Yucca Mountain

Selecting a bad site. Yucca Mountain was initially advertised as being very dry. It turned out there was lots more water in the mountain than the Department expected. When I became a consultant for the state of Nevada in 2001, I went down into a test chamber in the heart of the mountain and was surprised by the amount of water dripping on my head. Moreover, rainwater flowed down through the mountain and out to the site boundary much faster than the Energy Department had estimated, at least 10 times faster. It became clear the waste canisters would corrode much more rapidly than forecast and radioactive leakage beyond the site boundary would exceed even the lax standards imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency and adopted by the NRC.

Instead of admitting it had picked a bad site and returning to Congress for instructions on investigating another candidate, as it was required to do by law, the Energy Department invented an ersatz solution to compensate for the inadequate geology: a “drip shield.” Each of the 11,000 waste canisters in the many miles of tunnels would be covered by a 5-ton titanium alloy “mailbox” to shield it from the corrosive water flowing through the Mountain. With these in place, calculations showed that the canister and drip shield combination complied with the EPA and NRC licensing requirements.

In effect, the department was shifting to reliance on metal “engineered barriers,” when the whole point of a using a deep underground repository was to gain the advantage of geologic barriers. If you were going to rely primarily on the metal package, why still bother to put the canisters deep underground?

But there was a catch to this, too, one might even say a fraud was involved.

A flawed licensing process. While the Energy Department wanted credit for the 11,000 drip shields in the NRC review of its license application, it didn’t intend to install them with the waste canisters. For one thing, the cost of the needed 55,000 tons of titanium alloy was substantial, and putting in drip shields would have complicated the waste installation process and required new, as yet undesigned, equipment. Instead, the Energy Department’s plan “postponed” drip shield installation until the repository closed for good, in 100-300 years. But by then it would be impossible to install drip shields over the waste canisters: The internal underground transportation system would not be functioning, and rockfall would anyhow make passage impossible. Asked how the NRC could possibly accept this fantastical commitment, I remember an Energy Department official responding that “the NRC may not question the promise of a sister agency.”

The Energy Department refused to run any computer analyses on how the repository would perform if the drip shields didn’t get installed. Nevada managed to do this and found that, without drip shields, the repository failed the licensing requirement for radioactive leakage from the site. And the failure came early, in around a thousand years after repository closure. The NRC staff should have thrown out the department’s license application at the pre-qualification stage in 2008, but accepted it, rationalizing the Energy Department would address the drip shield issue in the upcoming hearing.

RELATED:

Congress takes aim at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission: ‘It’s déjà vu all over again’

NRC staff participates in all agency licensing hearings. Since at that point staffers had already reviewed the application favorably, they supported the license applicant. In the Yucca Mountain case, the staff outdid itself in its support of the Energy Department. The state of Nevada proposed over 200 issues for litigation before the NRC Licensing Board of three administrative judges; the Energy Department urged the Board to reject every single one of them and the NRC staff agreed in almost every instance. Judge Alan Rosenthal was so shocked at the NRC staffers’ bias that he reprimanded them for being “spear carriers” for the Energy Department. The licensing board rejected the NRC staff position and accepted more than 200 issues for litigation.

Stop the stalemate. The Yucca Mountain project was stalled indefinitely by the Obama administration before any substantive licensing hearing took place. It was not irrelevant that Nevada Senator Harry Reid was the Democratic majority leader, and his former assistant was NRC chairman. But the technical failures were a vital part of the background leading to this decision.

The 2012 report of a “Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future” recommended a “consent-based approach” to managing nuclear waste. The Energy Department got religion and formed an Office of Consent-Based Siting, whose website explains that consent-based siting “prioritizes the participation and needs of people and communities and seeks their willing and informed consent to accept a project in their community.” But the department still didn’t get it. It’s not making a show of consulting the public that gains trust. You need a good technical plan to start with and demonstrated competence and sense of responsibility to carry it out, as was the case in the Scandinavian countries. In my judgment, it’s too late for the Energy Department. I don’t think any state would ever trust the Energy Department to build and operate a nuclear waste repository.

The lack of a repository doesn’t seem to worry nuclear enthusiasts anymore, probably because it doesn’t threaten what reactor licensing there is. Recent legislation—the ADVANCE Act—to accelerate approval of new nuclear technologies does not mention nuclear waste at all. The focus is on subsidizing new reactor projects and “streamlining” licensing.

The United States, however, does need a better system for storing highly radioactive used fuel than the current situation of keeping it at over 80 storage locations in 36 states. A difficulty is that current law requires that, before the Energy Department can go forward with a surface storage facility to consolidate the used fuel, it has to have already selected a new geologic repository site, which isn’t happening. This restriction was inserted into the Nuclear Waste Policy Act to prevent the government from siting a “temporary” storage facility and then giving up on an underground repository for permanent disposal of the waste. Now, because of this restriction, the United States has neither centralized storage nor a repository, and the waste keeps piling up. Relaxing the provision in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act that has prevented temporary consolidated storage has to be the starting point of a sensible nuclear waste policy.


Subscribe

ABOUT THE FOLLOWING ACCESS TO “LLAW’S ALL THINGS NUCLEAR” RELATED MEDIA:

There are 7 categories, with the latest (#7) being a Friday weekly roundup of IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) global nuclear news stories. Also included is a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcanic and caldera activity around the world that play an important role in humanity’s lives. The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). The Categories are listed below in their usual order:

  1. All Things Nuclear
  2. Nuclear Power
  3. Nuclear Power Emergencies
  4. Nuclear War
  5. Nuclear War Threats
  6. Yellowstone Caldera (Note: There are three Yellowstone Caldera bonus stories available in this evening’s Post.)
  7. IAEA Weekly News (Friday’s only)

Whenever there is an underlined link to a Category media news story, if you press or click on the link provided, you no longer have to cut and paste to your web browser, since this Post’s link will take you directly to the article in your browser.

A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.

TODAY’S NUCLEAR WORLD’S NEWS, Wednesday, (07/31/2024)

All Things Nuclear

NEWS

Debating Global South Reactions to Russian Nuclear Threats – CSIS

CSIS

… things like nuclear … But these documents have publicly condemned nuclear saber-rattling and all instances leading to potential nuclear escalation.

New law expands nuclear power, but some question potential safety hazards

NewsCenter1

Supporters said energy demand is expected to grow over the next decade as electric vehicles, data centers and AI-related operations all search for a …

This wasn’t an oil spill or nuclear failure – The Martha’s Vineyard Times

The Martha’s Vineyard Times

There is no comparison of the above with the oil well blowouts or nuclear plant failures we have seen around the world. … All About Pets, All-Island …

Nuclear Power

NEWS

New law expands nuclear power, but some question potential safety hazards – WGIL

WGIL

The nuclear power industry recently received a boost with a bill that allows expansion, but not everyone is on board. President Joe Biden signed …

Singapore signs agreement with US to deepen understanding of nuclear reactors, safety

The Straits Times

The move will help Singapore make a more informed decision on nuclear power as a clean energy source, said the authorities, who stressed that no …

Why US nuclear waste policy got stalled. And what to do about it.

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Before 1975, when the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) was split into the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Energy and Research and Development …

Nuclear Power Emergencies

NEWS

Classification, Assessment and Prognosis During Nuclear Power Plant Emergencies | IAEA

International Atomic Energy Agency

Ordering Locally. Please use the following links for an up-to-date list of IAEA distributors: Distributors of IAEA Publications.

Iran reportedly convenes emergency meeting after killing of Hamas leader | News.az

News.az

Future of nuclear energy in Kazakhstan: What will the referendum decide?

What can you do with a master’s degree in emergency management? – EMS1

EMS1

As disasters can strike at any time or location, every field requires some form of an emergency response team. From airports and nuclear power plants …

Nuclear War

NEWS

The United States, North Korea and Nuclear War – Modern Diplomacy

Modern Diplomacy

Among the world’s nuclear trouble spots, North Korea is the most plainly time-urgent. In managing this threat, North Korean “denuclearization” …

Putin often cites Russia’s ‘nuclear doctrine’ governing the use of atomic weapons. But what is it?

AP.org

Since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, President Vladimir Putin and other Kremlin voices have frequently threatened the West with its nuclear.

Russian military begins 3rd round ofls to train troops in tactical nuclear weapons

AP News

The Russian Defense Ministry said the drills will feature units of the central and southern military districts armed with Iskander short-range …

Nuclear War Threats

NEWS

US must expand nuclear arsenal in face of Russia, China threat | Fox News

Fox News

The strategy of deterrence was established during the Cold War between Washington and Moscow due to the threat of mutually assured destruction should …

What is in Putin’s ‘nuclear doctrine’ that could trigger a Russian attack? | The Independent

The Independent

On Day 1 of the war, President Vladimir Putin said “whoever tries to impede us, let alone create threats for our country and its people, …

Amid Western threats, Russia starts third stage of tactical nuclear drills – Firstpost

Firstpost

Amid Western threats, Russia starts third stage of tactical nuclear drills … Russia has begun the third stage of drills to practise the deployment of 

Yellowstone Caldera

NEWS

After Biscuit Basin explosion, Yellowstone will look into tracking hydrothermal booms

Gillette News Record

But well before the blast captured the attention of the internet, scientists with the park, universities and the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory were …

After Biscuit Basin explosion, Yellowstone will look into tracking hydrothermal booms | State

Wyoming Tribune Eagle

Save. Tags. Geothermal Areas Of Yellowstone · Yellowstone Caldera · Geyser · Volcano · Infrasound · Yellowstone National Park · Hydrothermal Explosion …

Yellowstone Biscuit Basin explosion may have created a new geyser – Live Science

Live Science

Geologists at the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory (YVO) estimated the height of the plume by examining photos posted on social media. They also …Nuclear PowerNEWS

LLAW’s All Things Nuclear #707, Tuesday, (07/30/2024)

“End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity”

Lloyd A. Williams-Pendergraft

Jul 30, 2024

1

Share

It’s time to reduce the likelihood of the day after . . .

LLAW’s NUCLEAR ISSUES & COMMENTS, Tuesday, (07/30/2024)

Not only you and me, but everybody else on planet Earth should be more than concerned, but absolutely terrified, about the future of nuclear war if Donald J. Trump should win the November presidential election. America and the world cannot let that happen.

This article from the “The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists” not only tells us why, but given the possibility of Trump winning the election, the article tells us how Trump’s authority to single-handedly start a nuclear war might be prevented. But of course, though, the absolute best way to avoid such a “threat” is to elect Kamala Harris and send Trump packing . . . ~llaw

logo footer

Trump could win back the nuclear codes. Biden should put guardrails on the nuclear arsenal—now.

By Tom Z. Collina | July 30, 2024

It’s time to reduce the likelihood of the day after.

On January 6, 2021, then-President Donald Trump inspired a mob attack on the US Capitol to try to prevent the peaceful transfer of power to the Biden administration. Not only was this an unprecedented attack on American democracy, but it represented a serious national security threat. Many saw and see this as one of many examples of an unstable President Trump acting in dangerous, irrational ways. And throughout his time in office, Trump—like all presidents in the nuclear age—had the unilateral authority to launch the US nuclear arsenal.

At any moment, Trump could literally have ended the world with a phone call. Congressional approval is not needed, and the secretary of defense cannot stop a presidential order to unleash the US nuclear arsenal. The system is built for speed, not deliberation. The whole process, from presidential order to the launch of one or hundreds of nuclear warheads, would take just minutes.

The danger that Trump would do something catastrophic was so acute that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi desperately looked for ways to prevent the “unstable president from … accessing the launch codes and ordering a nuclear strike,” according to a letter Pelosi wrote in January 2021 to House Democrats in the wake of the January 6 attack on the Capitol. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley was convinced that Trump had suffered “serious mental decline in the aftermath of the election” and took the extraordinary step of ordering his staff to come to him if they received a nuclear strike order from the president. “No matter what you are told, you do the procedure. You do the process. And I’m part of that procedure,” Milley reportedly told the officers. “You never know what a president’s trigger point is.”

Pelosi and Milley had plenty of reasons to worry that Trump could start a nuclear war. In August 2017, in a thinly veiled nuclear threat, Trump warned North Korea that it would be “met with fire and fury and frankly power, the likes of which this world has never seen before.” Trump mocked Kim Jong Un, the North’s leader, writing “I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!” According to then-White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, Trump privately discussed the idea of using a nuclear weapon against North Korea and suggested he could blame a US strike on another country.

RELATED:

No debate: On existential threats, Biden, Trump, and CNN all largely failed

Actually, however, Milley was not correct when he told his staff that he was part of the formal procedure to launch nuclear weapons. As former Defense Secretary William J. Perry and I wrote in our 2020 book, The Button, policy established during the Cold War puts decisions about the use of nuclear weapons solely in the hands of the civilian president, not Congress and above all not the military. All the president need do is call the Pentagon’s War Room—using the nuclear “football” or some other means—and identify himself and give the order to launch. The president may choose to consult with senior advisors such as Milley but is not required to.

Milley broke these rules, as others broke them before him. During the Watergate crisis, then-Defense Secretary James Schlesinger was so concerned about President Richard Nixon’s mental state and alcohol consumption that he told military commanders that if Nixon ordered a nuclear strike, they should check with him or Secretary of State Henry Kissinger first. Sen. Alan Cranston phoned Schlesinger, warning him about “the need for keeping a berserk president from plunging us into a holocaust.”

Should Milley, Schlesinger, or any military leader, let a clearly unstable president start a nuclear war just to follow protocol? Of course not. But officials should not have to break the rules to do the right thing. The United States needs to change the policy that put Milley and Schlesinger in an impossible spot.

With just six months left in office, President Biden can fix the system for himself and all future presidents. To do so, Biden should announce the White House will share authority to use nuclear weapons in any first strike with a select group in Congress. The Constitution gives Congress the authority to declare war, not the president. The first use of nuclear weapons is clearly an act of war. In a situation where the United States has already been attacked with nuclear weapons, the president would retain the option to act unilaterally.

RELATED:

Is there any debate? This is the existential threat scorecard you need to rate the Biden and Trump matchup

President Biden would have to make such a policy change by executive order. Passing congressional legislation would be more durable but is unlikely in the current political environment. If Trump wins the election, he would likely reverse Biden’s order. But if Vice President Kamala Harris wins, the new policy could be strengthened over time with legislation.

Such a policy would provide clear directives for the military to follow: A launch could be ordered only if the United States had already been attacked with nuclear weapons or if Congress had approved the decision, providing a constitutional check to executive power. This would be infinitely safer than our current doctrine.

As an important part of his legacy, President Biden must put guardrails on presidential authority to start nuclear war now before the next dangerous leader gets elected—whomever and whenever that may be. We must never again entrust the fate of the world to just one fallible human. This is not about whose finger should be on the button. This is about making good policy that can keep Americans—and people around the world—alive, regardless of whom US voters happen to put in the White House.


Subscribe

ABOUT THE FOLLOWING ACCESS TO “LLAW’S ALL THINGS NUCLEAR” RELATED MEDIA:

There are 7 categories, with the latest (#7) being a Friday weekly roundup of IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) global nuclear news stories. Also included is a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcanic and caldera activity around the world that play an important role in humanity’s lives. The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). The Categories are listed below in their usual order:

  1. All Things Nuclear
  2. Nuclear Power
  3. Nuclear Power Emergencies
  4. Nuclear War
  5. Nuclear War Threats
  6. Yellowstone Caldera (Note: There is one Yellowstone Caldera bonus story available in this evening’s Post.)
  7. IAEA Weekly News (Friday’s only)

Whenever there is an underlined link to a Category media news story, if you press or click on the link provided, you no longer have to cut and paste to your web browser, since this Post’s link will take you directly to the article in your browser.

A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.

TODAY’S NUCLEAR WORLD’S NEWS, Tuesday, (07/30/2024)

All Things Nuclear

NEWS

‘The Boiling Moat’ argues U.S. should prepare to help Taiwan defend against China

KERA News

All Things Considered. Next Up: 5:00 PM Notes From America. 0:00. 0:00. All … INSKEEP: Does the United States even have to be prepared for a nuclear …

‘The Boiling Moat’ argues U.S. should prepare to help Taiwan defend against China | KALW

KALW

All Things Considered. KALW. All Things Considered. Next Up: 4:00 PM … I don’t think that the risk of nuclear war is high at all. INSKEEP: I …

‘The Boiling Moat’ argues U.S. should prepare to help Taiwan defend against China

WCMU Public Radio

All Things Considered · Destination Out · Fresh Air · Here and Now · Homespun … INSKEEP: Does the United States even have to be prepared for a nuclear …

Nuclear Power

NEWS

Nuclear is a toxic idea … here’s why – Environment Victoria

Environment Victoria

Clean energy is already here, generating 40% of our electricity in 2023! It’s on our rooftops, co-existing on farms, embraced by local businesses, and …

Why nuclear energy is not the solution to the climate crisis – UBC News

UBC News – The University of British Columbia

In this Q&A, Dr. M.V. Ramana discusses key insights from his new book and why nuclear power does not help mitigate climate change.

These states have the most nuclear reactors – Quartz

Quartz

Nuclear power is considered an important way to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the near future. Though there have long been safety fears …

Nuclear Power Emergencies

NEWS

US buys 4.65 million barrels for emergency oil stockpile – Reuters

Reuters

The U.S. Department of Energy said on Monday it had finalized a contract to purchase 4.65 million barrels of crude oil for the Strategic Petroleum …

Gas leaks burden emergency services – PIRG

PIRG

PSE Health Energy released a new study analyzing the burden on emergency response services due to uncombusted gas leaks. … Nuclear power risks …

Nuclear War

NEWS

Putin often cites Russia’s ‘nuclear doctrine’ governing the use of atomic weapons. But what is it?

ABC News – The Walt Disney Company

In a blunt signal to discourage the West from increasing military support for Ukraine, President Vladimir Putin says Russia could revise its …

Nuclear Posture Review for the Next Administration: Building the Nuclear Arsenal of the …

The Heritage Foundation

Without a credible American deterrent, the autocrats in Beijing and Moscow will become increasingly likely to use nuclear coercion against America and …

Trump could win back the nuclear codes. Biden should put guardrails on the nuclear arsenal—now.

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

As an important part of his legacy, President Biden should put guardrails on presidential authority to start nuclear war now before the next …

Nuclear War Threats

NEWS

Putin often cites Russia’s ‘nuclear doctrine’ governing the use of atomic weapons. But what is it?

ABC News – The Walt Disney Company

On Day 1 of the war, Putin said “whoever tries to impede us, let alone create threats for our country and its people, must know that the Russian …

Nuclear Posture Review for the Next Administration: Building the Nuclear Arsenal of the …

The Heritage Foundation

… threatened the West with nuclear war. As the war in Ukraine drags on … The evolving nature of non-nuclear strategic threats, including the growing …

What Public Opinion Says About the Use of Nuclear Weapons | The MIT Press Reader

The MIT Press Reader

Vladimir Putin has issued nuclear threats in the context of the Russo-Ukraine War. As president, Donald Trump publicly warned North Korea of possible 

Yellowstone Caldera

NEWS

Scientists find proof of April hydrothermal explosion in Yellowstone – Buckrail

Buckrail

But as part of the new Volcano and Earthquake Monitoring Plan for the Yellowstone Caldera System, a monitoring station was installed at the Norris …

LLAW’s All Things Nuclear #706, Monday, (07/29/2024)

“End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity”

Lloyd A. Williams-Pendergraft

Jul 29, 2024

1

Share

LLAW’s NUCLEAR ISSUES & COMMENTS, Monday, (07/29/2024)

What a pleasant surprise today to find this article in my “LLAW’S ALL THINGS NUCLEAR” RELATED MEDIA automated daily collection in the “Nuclear Power” category of listings. I had almost decided, as I read through today’s material, to Post a story by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists titled: Interview: Rose Gottemoeller on the precarious future of arms control from the “All Things Nuclear” category, which you might want to read on your own.

But instead, Mr. M.V. Ramana’s factual and brilliant excerpt from his recently published book, Nuclear Is Not the Solution: The Folly of Atomic Power in the Age of Climate Change because he elaborated with absolute both educated and practical technical facts, pointing out and clearly explaining several of my own concerns about why we mistakenly think or even believe that nuclear power could possibly save our increasingly desperate environmental problems.

With constantly increasing global warming/climate change from CO2 and other greenhouse gasses caused by our never-ending reliance on producing energy by burning fossil fuels, we are already contributing to the immanent demise of humanity and other life hand-in-hand with burning radioactive uranium in nuclear power plants, thereby doubly ensuring planet Earth’s 6th Extinction. ~llaw

Literary Hub

Via Verso Books

Atomic Fallacy: Why Nuclear Power Won’t Solve the Climate Crisis

M.V. Ramana Debunks Some Common Arguments About Energy In an Era of Ecological Emergency

By M.V. Ramana


July 29, 2024

I am scared about how fast climate change is disrupting our world. At a theoretical level, I have known for decades about growing carbon dioxide emissions and resultant changes to global and local temperatures, sea-level rise, severe storms, wildfires, and so on. But it was not till 2012, when Hurricane Sandy hit the northeast of the United States, that I was directly impacted. The power of that storm was immense, but I knew—theoretically, of course—that people elsewhere had experienced far worse storms.

More recently—in August 2023, as I was finishing this book—it was the turn of wildfires. As the McDougall Creek wildfire came closer to the University of British Columbia (UBC) campus in Kelowna, students and staff were asked to evacuate. My daughter Shruti is a student there. Because it was summer, she was at home in the Vancouver campus of UBC, where I teach. Had the fires occurred just two weeks later, I would have definitely been panicking.

I can go on for much longer in this vein. But there isn’t any need. Just about anyone alive today has been impacted in some way by climate change. Others have written at length about how the climate crisis is intensifying by the year, and one can stock a small library with published books about the myriad risks flowing from climate change. The library would be even larger if one included literature on the other related multiple cascading ecological crises we are confronting.

Although climate change scares me, I am even more scared of a future with more nuclear plants.

As someone trained in physics, and as an academic paid to research, I have been drawn to studying one essential contributor to these crises: how energy and electricity are produced, especially those methods proposed to mitigate climate change. Prominent among these proposals is nuclear energy.

Although climate change scares me, I am even more scared of a future with more nuclear plants. Increasing how much energy is produced with nuclear reactors would greatly exacerbate the risk of severe accidents like the one at Chernobyl, expand how much of our environment is contaminated with radioactive wastes that remain hazardous for millennia, and last but not least, make catastrophic nuclear war more likely.

Some might argue that these risks are the price we must pay to counter the threat of climate change. I disagree, but even if one were to adopt this position, my research shows that nuclear energy is just not a feasible solution to climate change. A nuclear power plant is a really expensive way to produce electricity. And nuclear energy simply cannot be scaled fast enough to match the rate at which the world needs to lower carbon emissions to stay under 1.5 degrees Celsius, or even 2 degrees.

Cost and the slow rate of deployment largely explain why the share of global electricity produced by nuclear reactors has been steadily declining, from around 16.9 percent in 1997, when the Kyoto Protocol was signed, to 9.2 percent in 2022. In contrast, as the costs of wind and solar energy declined dramatically, and modern renewables (which do not include large dams) went from supplying 1.2 percent of the world’s electricity in 1997 to 14.4 percent in 2022.

Another contrast is revealing. When pro-nuclear advocates talk about solving climate change with nuclear energy, they call for building lots and lots of reactors. The World Nuclear Association, for example, proposes building thousands of nuclear reactors, which would together be capable of generating a million megawatts of electricity, by 2050. Such a goal is completely at odds with historical rates of building nuclear reactors.

Some proponents of nuclear energy refuse to give up on the technology. They blame the decline in nuclear energy and the high costs and long construction periods on the characteristics of older reactor designs, arguing that alternative designs will rescue nuclear energy from its woes. In recent years, the alternatives most often advertised are small modular (nuclear) reactors—SMRs for short. These are designed to generate between 10 and 300 megawatts of power, much less than the 1,000–1,600 megawatts that reactors being built today are designed to produce.

For over a decade now, many of my colleagues and I have consistently explained why these reactors would not be commercially viable and why they would never resolve the undesirable consequences of building nuclear power plants. I first started examining small modular reactors when I worked at Princeton University’s Program on Science and Global Security. Our group largely comprised physicists, and we used a mixture of technical assessments, mathematical techniques, and social-science-based methods to study various problems associated with these technologies. My colleague Alex Glaser, for example, used neutronics models to calculate how much uranium would be required as fuel for SMRs, which we then used to estimate the increased risk of nuclear weapons proliferation from deploying such reactors. Zia Mian, originally from Pakistan, and I showed why the technical characteristics of SMRs would not allow for simultaneously solving the four key problems identified with nuclear power: its high costs, its accident risks, the difficulty of dealing with radioactive waste, and its linkage with the capacity to make nuclear weapons. My colleagues and I also undertook case studies on Jordan, Ghana, and Indonesia, three countries advertised by SMR vendors as potential customers, and showed that despite much talk, none of them were investing in SMRs, because of various country-specific reasons such as public opposition and institutional interests.

We were not the only people coming up with reasons for not believing in the claim that new reactor designs would solve all these problems. Other scientists and analysts also highlighted the dangers and false promises of SMRs.

Nuclear advocates are not deterred by such arguments. They insist that this time it will be different. Nuclear plants would be cheap, would be quick to build, would be safe, would never have to be shut down in unplanned ways, and would not be affected by climate-related extreme weather events. The evidence from the real world, which I elaborate on later, suggests otherwise. Nuclear reactors are unlikely to possess any of these characteristics, let alone all of them. Thus, what is actually being advocated might be termed faux nuclear plants, existing only in the imagination of some, not in the real world.

My bottom line is that nuclear energy, whether with old reactor designs or new faux alternatives, will simply not resolve the climate crisis. The threat from climate change is urgent. The world has neither the financial resources nor the luxury of time to expand nuclear power. Meanwhile, even a limited expansion would aggravate a range of environmental and ecological risks. Further, nuclear energy is deeply imbricated in creating the conditions for nuclear annihilation. Expanding nuclear power would leave us in the worst of both worlds.

*

Proponents of nuclear energy have other reasons to support their preferred technology. They argue that nuclear reactors can do much more than just generate electricity. The “much more” depends on the specific context, and could include creating well-paying jobs, boosting national pride, providing energy independence, supplying clean water, and producing medical isotopes to treat cancer. As the public has become more concerned about climate change, nuclear advocates have appended to this list two more applications for energy from nuclear reactors: capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (direct air capture) and producing hydrogen and high-temperature heat for industrial processes.

All of these are reminiscent of what Admiral Lewis Strauss, one of the central characters in the hit Hollywood film Oppenheimer and the chair of the US Atomic Energy Commission in the 1950s, told the National Association of Science Writers on September 16, 1954. Ten days after the groundbreaking for first US nuclear plant, Strauss told his audience that given the great promise of nuclear technology, it would not be “too much to expect that our children will enjoy in their homes electrical energy too cheap to meter.”

It is the weakness of the nuclear industry that forces it to seek alliances with other constituencies.

The many claims about what else nuclear reactors can do make one wonder: Is nuclear energy too virtuous to meter?

Let me offer one example from a company called Hyperion Power Generation offering a small nuclear power plant design that was actively covered in the media between 2007 and 2012. In March 2010, the founder of this company, John Deal, told the Albuquerque Journal, “We started this company to clean water in Africa…Our emphasis is helping people not die from not having clean water…If you’ve got energy, you can have all the clean water you want.”

This was not a one-off sales pitch. In their 2011 article in Issues in Science and Technology, writer Ross Carper and academic Sonja Schmid offer this description of Deal in action:

In the middle of Deal’s talk in Denver, he began flipping through some artist-drawn images. The most striking of all shows a small nuclear reactor, buried and unattended at what looked to be less than 15 feet below the surface. Two simple tubes snake upward from the reactor, drawing the eye to a pair of gray above-ground tanks, with the words “Potable Water” stamped on the side. The setting? An impoverished African village complete with about a dozen mud-constructed, thatch-roofed huts. A handful of people were drawn into the image, all of them walking to or from the clean water source, which is apparently powered by a $50 million HPM.

HPM stands for Hyperion Power Module, the nuclear reactor the company was advertising, and the cost estimate of $50 million for a nuclear reactor should be seen in that light as wishfully cheap. (A few years later, PitchBook, a database of private equity-based corporations, listed the company as “out of business.”)

Such promises of atomic energy delivering progress to Africa date back to the beginning of the nuclear age. On January 28, 1947, for example, Waldemar Kaempffert, the science editor of the New York Times, predicted,

The desert of Sahara could easily be irrigated by electric pumps driven by uranium power, with the result that more surplus cotton than we could sell at a profit and more surplus plant food than we could eat would be dumped on the market. Africa would be transformed into another Europe, with savages [sic!] who never saw a steam shovel or railway train transformed into machine tenders.

After more than half a century of experience with nuclear technology, ideas about using it to provide clean water to poor people are delusional at worst and deceptively self-serving at best. Reducing the problem of insufficient clean water to an absence of energy ignores the many other problems that prevent African villagers from accessing clean water and the persisting legacies of colonialism and imperialism that led to “underdevelopment” in the first place.

In his “communal memoir” of the aerospace industry Blue Sky Dream, the journalist David Beers talks about a special characteristic of the former Nazi rocket scientist Wernher von Braun, the man sometimes termed “the father of America’s space program” due to his important role in transferring rocket technology to the United States.

The classic American entrepreneurial hero searches out unmet desires in the everyday world and then, with a certain flexible flair, invents the answers, products for the masses to use. Von Braun’s genius lay elsewhere. He was brilliant at inventing new and different uses for the only product he ever desired to make, the space rocket. He was a master at selling his one product to the only customers who could ever afford it, a nation’s rulers.

Much like von Braun, vendors and advocates of nuclear power are really interested only in selling nuclear reactors, and they try to invent different uses for their favored product. Delivering clean water, heating houses or industries, and propelling rockets and ships are all only vehicles for selling nuclear reactors. However, the appeal to other uses for nuclear reactors is also, simultaneously, an expression of the inability of the technology to economically deliver on its primary product: electricity. It is the weakness of the nuclear industry that forces it to seek alliances with other constituencies.

__________________________________

From Nuclear Is Not the Solution: The Folly of Atomic Power in the Age of Climate Change by M.V. Ramana. Copyright © 2024. Available from Verso Books.


Subscribe

ABOUT THE FOLLOWING ACCESS TO “LLAW’S ALL THINGS NUCLEAR” RELATED MEDIA:

There are 7 categories, with the latest (#7) being a Friday weekly roundup of IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) global nuclear news stories. Also included is a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcanic and caldera activity around the world that play an important role in humanity’s lives. The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). The Categories are listed below in their usual order:

  1. All Things Nuclear
  2. Nuclear Power
  3. Nuclear Power Emergencies
  4. Nuclear War
  5. Nuclear War Threats
  6. Yellowstone Caldera (Note: There are 3 Yellowstone Caldera bonus stories available in this evening’s Post.)
  7. IAEA Weekly News (Friday’s only)

Whenever there is an underlined link to a Category media news story, if you press or click on the link provided, you no longer have to cut and paste to your web browser, since this Post’s link will take you directly to the article in your browser.

A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.

TODAY’S NUCLEAR WORLD’S NEWS, Monday, (07/29/2024)

All Things Nuclear

NEWS

Interview: Rose Gottemoeller on the precarious future of arms control

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

However, I like to point out two things about the “program of record” nuclear modernization. … nuclear weapon: ‘A Bomb for all Asians and Africans’.

Putin threatens to restart production of mid-range nuclear weapons – KULR-8

KULR-8

All the attributes of the Cold War with the direct confrontation are … Great Things in Great Falls – July 27, 2024 · Attorney General ghost …

What will a new push for nuclear energy look like in Missouri and Illinois? – STLPR

STLPR

That’s about a quarter of Ameren’s 2023 electricity — and all of that nuclear power was carbon-free. Callaway Energy Center’s cooling tower on …

Nuclear Power

NEWS

A Radical Reboot of Nuclear Energy – YouTube

YouTube

Nuclear power, once the great hope for a clean way to meet the world’s energy needs, fell out of favor decades ago.

Construction starts on two new Chinese units – World Nuclear News

World Nuclear News

The pouring of first concrete has been announced for both unit 5 at the Ningde nuclear power plant in Fujian Province and unit 1 of the Shidaowan …

Atomic Fallacy: Why Nuclear Power Won’t Solve the Climate Crisis – Literary Hub

Literary Hub

Prominent among these proposals is nuclear energy. Although climate change scares me, I am even more scared of a future with more nuclear plants.

Nuclear Power Emergencies

NEWS

Emergency, Crisis and Disaster Management Centre – Abu Dhabi and Abu Dhabi Police …

mediaoffice.abudhabi

… Disaster Management Centre – Abu Dhabi and Abu Dhabi Police have conducted training for the emergency response members of Barakah Nuclear Energy

Atomic Fallacy: Why Nuclear Power Won’t Solve the Climate Crisis – Literary Hub

Literary Hub

Ramana Debunks Some Common Arguments About Energy In an Era of Ecological Emergency. By M.V. Ramana. July 29, 2024. I am scared about how fast …

Nuclear War

NEWS

North Korea May Test Nuclear Missile Around U.S. Election, South Warns | TIME

Time

North Korea has a habit of timing its provocations to coincide with major political events, and Kim has rolled out new warheads capable of …

Russian President Putin Issues Nuclear Threat over US’ Announcement – YouTube

YouTube

Russian President Putin Issues Nuclear Threat over US’ Announcement | Vantage with Palki Sharma Russian President Vladimir Putin has issued a …

‘The Boiling Moat’ argues U.S. should prepare to help Taiwan defend against China – WUFT

WUFT

NPR’s Steve Inskeep talks to Matt Pottinger, editor of “The Boiling Moat,” about the U.S. protecting Taiwan from an ever-encroaching China.

Nuclear War Threats

NEWS

Germany Says Will Not Be ‘Intimidated’ by Putin’s Nuclear Threats – The Moscow Times

The Moscow Times

Germany said on Monday it was not deterred by Russian President Vladimir Putin’s threats to relaunch production of intermediate-range nuclear …

In a Perilous Time: Nuclear Dangers, Politics, and the New Cold War

Pressenza – International Press Agency

… risks escalation to nuclear war. The refusal of the nuclear powers and others to eliminate the nuclear and climate existential threats places the …

Berlin ‘Will Not be Intimidated’ by Moscow’s Nuclear Threats, Says German Foreign Minister

Kyiv Post

Berlin ‘Will Not be Intimidated’ by Moscow’s Nuclear Threats, Says German Foreign Minister … Follow our coverage of the war on the @Kyivpost_official.

Yellowstone Caldera

NEWS

After Biscuit Basin explosion, Yellowstone will look into tracking hydothermal booms | Local

Jackson Hole News & Guide

A continuous gas-monitoring station operates near Yellowstone National Park’s Norris Geyser Basin. Scientists with the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory …

The Best Social Media Follows Right Now Are Actual Mountains – The Daily Beast

The Daily Beast

Yellowstone itself lacks zest, but the parody accounts for the Yellowstone Caldera and Supervolano are on it. Lake Tahoe likes to riff and each of …

The theory says that complex life on Earth may be much older than previously thought.

La Ronge Northerner

Yellowstone caldera, sometimes referred to as the Yellowstone supervolcano, is a volcanic caldera and supervolcano in Yellowstone National Park in…

LLAW’s All Things Nuclear #705, Sunday, (07/28/2024)

“End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity”

Lloyd A. Williams-Pendergraft

Jul 28, 2024

1

Share

Fusion has often been criticised for always being ’10 years away’

LLAW’s NUCLEAR ISSUES & COMMENTS, Sunday, (07/28/2024)

Every few days, or so it seems, I read an optimistic article about how ‘fusion’ nuclear power will replace ‘fission’ nuclear power (sometimes so optimistic that the possibility is “just right around the corner.”) Some media discusses the latest ‘fusion’ breakthroughs as the future of nuclear power and will save us from global warming/climate change created by CO2 and other greenhouse gasses from burning fossil fuel power plants such as coal, oil, and natural gas. Rest assured: that will not happen.

Why? Because, simply said, “fusion” is not a feasible alternative because the best guess of it ever becoming a reality is somewhere nearer the turn of the century (2100), and even by then the probability is extremely doubtful. We have only recently taken the first baby-step into creating fusion on earth.

Here is a brief AI review: “In February 2024, European researchers at the Joint European Torus (JET) facility in the UK set a new world record for sustained and controlled fusion energy, producing 69 megajoules of energy over five seconds. This was triple the amount of energy produced in similar tests in 1997, and enough to power 41,000 homes for five seconds.”

Prior to that the only positive controlled fusion energy was of an even smaller time frame accomplished by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in December of 2023 — just the 2nd time a reactor produced more energy than it consumed. So the only positive thing that can be said about nuclear fusion is that it is possible because it has been done, but only on the smallest of positive scales.

So it baffles me how anyone can say that we will be ‘feasting’ on ‘fusion’ by mid-century. It seems to me that it cannot happen before the turn of the century, and of course, given our history of misunderstanding how to safely handle ‘all things nuclear’, will such a power plant be safe for humanity’s best minds to achieve? I think not. Some of the best minds in the short history of “harnessing” nuclear fission or fusion, including Albert Einstein, have, long ago, said something akin to “forget about it”. ~llaw

The huge challenges in creating fusion power plant

Greig Watson

BBC East Midlands

UK Atomic Energy Authority Fusion reactor
UK Atomic Energy Authority

Fusion has often been criticised for always being ’10 years away’

The project to build a nuclear fusion reactor in Nottinghamshire has been described as the “UK’s Nasa moment”.

But beyond the optimism of an event showcasing the scheme, how close is it to becoming a reality?

Is the promise of clean, cheap and secure energy still obscured by huge scientific, engineering and economic hurdles? And is it safe?

Two experts give us their take.

Former coal fired power station West Burton A, near Retford, was chosen as the location for the Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP), in October 2022.

However, even if investors are found and construction completed on schedule, the facility is unlikely to open before 2040.

Explaining the process, Dr Aneeqa Khan, lecturer in nuclear materials at the University of Manchester, said: “Nuclear fusion is the process that powers the Sun, where two nuclei fuse together, liberating huge amounts of energy.

“Recreating the conditions in the centre of the Sun on Earth is a huge challenge.

“We need to heat up isotopes of hydrogen gas so they become the fourth state of matter, called plasma.

“In order for the nuclei to fuse together on Earth, we need temperatures 10 times hotter than the Sun – around 100 million Celsius.”

The promise of fusion is great – but so are the challenges

Dr Brian Appelbe, a research fellow in nuclear fusion at Imperial College London, said fusion differed from traditional nuclear power – fission – in several fundamental ways.

He said: “Fission is about breaking heavy element apart, fusion is about forcing lighter element together.

“The amounts of energy that are released with fusion are far higher than fission.

“And the elements being used, like hydrogen, are far more widely available than the fission fuels. Some, like deuterium, a form of hydrogen, can be sourced from sea water.

“This is a much cleaner source of energy because it makes less radioactive material and it is radioactivity which doesn’t last as long.”

Dr Khan added: “We are still a way off commercial fusion. Building a fusion power plant also has many engineering and materials challenges.

“However, investment in fusion is growing and we are making real progress.

“We need to be training up a huge number of people with the skills to work in the field and I hope the technology will be used in the latter half of the century.

“Global collaboration is key in achieving this.”

Dr Appelbe said: “The news about the Nottinghamshire site is very exciting and there is a lot of development happening but we are still at the scientific stage of developing fusion.

“There is a real momentum building and I am optimistic about overcoming the scientific hurdles to building a functioning fusion power plant but I’m not an engineer or economist.

“But I wouldn’t want to put a timescale on it.”

Getty Images Protest poster
Getty Images

Public opposition has been one of the most powerful obstacles to nuclear power

One of the practical problems which has dogged traditional nuclear power is public opposition, often based around fear of leaks and accidents.

Dr Appelbe said: “I’d certainly live next to a fusion station.

“It uses small amounts of fuel very quickly, so there are not the large amounts of fuel which are around for much longer with fission, which have been the source of some accidents such as Chernobyl.

“This, combined with the challenge of keeping a fusion reaction going, means there is no way you can have catastrophic runaway issues.”


Subscribe

ABOUT THE FOLLOWING ACCESS TO “LLAW’S ALL THINGS NUCLEAR” RELATED MEDIA:

There are 7 categories, with the latest (#7) being a Friday weekly roundup of IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) global nuclear news stories. Also included is a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcanic and caldera activity around the world that play an important role in humanity’s lives. The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). The Categories are listed below in their usual order:

  1. All Things Nuclear
  2. Nuclear Power
  3. Nuclear Power Emergencies
  4. Nuclear War
  5. Nuclear War Threats
  6. Yellowstone Caldera (Note: There is one Yellowstone Caldera bonus storiy available in this evening’s Post.)
  7. IAEA Weekly News (Friday’s only)

Whenever there is an underlined link to a Category media news story, if you press or click on the link provided, you no longer have to cut and paste to your web browser, since this Post’s link will take you directly to the article in your browser.

A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.

TODAY’S NUCLEAR WORLD’S NEWS, Sunday, (07/28/2024)

All Things Nuclear

NEWS

Putin threatens to restart production of intermediate-range nuclear weapons if US

Times of India

… All about viral hepatitis and preventive measures to stop its transmissionBTS Jimin’s ‘Who’ dominates Spotify’s daily top songs – global chart for …

When temptation to spend an inheritance strikes, what’s the right move? – San Diego Union-Tribune

San Diego Union-Tribune

Should California’s Legislature jump into the debate about nuclear waste at San Onofre? Will India surpass California on a theoretical GDP scorecard …

Putin Threatens To Restart Production of Mid-Range Nuclear Weapons – The Moscow Times

The Moscow Times

All the attributes of the Cold War with the direct confrontation … Read more about: Putin , Nuclear , Arms. A Message from The Moscow Ti..

Nuclear Power

NEWS

The huge challenges in creating nuclear fusion power plant – BBC News

BBC

The project to build a nuclear fusion reactor in Nottinghamshire has been described as the “UK’s Nasa moment”. But beyond the optimism of an event …

Construction starts on several projects at nuclear power plants, accelerating China’s clean …

Global Times

Construction or upgrading began recently on several projects at nuclear plants in China, a significant development in the country’s nuclear power …

Taiwan decommissions Maanshan Nuclear Power Plant reactor | Taiwan News | Jul. 28, 2024 12:24

Taiwan News

TAIPEI (Taiwan News) — Taiwan decommissioned Maanshan Nuclear Power Plant’s Unit 1 reactor on Saturday (July 27) at 10 p.m..

Nuclear War

NEWS

Putin warns US of Cold War-style crisis if missiles deployed to Germany – Al Jazeera

Al Jazeera

Russian leader threatens to relaunch production of intermediate-range nuclear weapons if US deploys missiles to Germany.

Putin warns the US of Cold War-style missile crisis | Reuters

Reuters

MOSCOW, July 28 (Reuters) – Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sunday warned the United States that if Washington deployed long-range missiles in …

Putin warns the United States of Cold War-style missile crisis – VOA News

VOA News

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sunday warned the United States that if Washington deployed long-range missiles in Germany, then Russia would …

Nuclear War Threats

NEWS

Putin warns US of Cold War-style crisis if missiles deployed to Germany – Al Jazeera

Al Jazeera

But following the end of the Cold War, the US significantly reduced the number of missiles stationed in Europe as the threat from Moscow receded. The …

U.S. upgrades military command in Japan, warns of China threats | Reuters

Reuters

“Amidst increasingly severe nuclear threats in the vicinity of Japan, it is important to further strengthen extended deterrence. I welcome the …

Chilling US map shows areas most likely to be targeted in a nuclear war – is your state on it?

Irish Star

The threat of nuclear war looms over parts of America as Russia’s … Late in 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin stoked further fears when he issued .

Yellowstone Caldera

NEWS

If Yellowstone’s volcanic system erupted, how could it impact the US? – WNCT

WNCT

… Yellowstone were to erupt. The Yellowstone Volcano Observatory said a large eruption at Yellowstone “will not lead to the end of the human race …

LLAW’s All Things Nuclear #704, Saturday, (07/27/2024)

“End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity”

Lloyd A. Williams-Pendergraft

Jul 28, 2024

1

Share

CAESAR in Ukraine French western aid

A French CAESAR howitzer at work in Ukraine. Photo: Territorial Defense Media

LLAW’s NUCLEAR ISSUES & COMMENTS, Saturday, (07/27/2024)

The U.S. Senate and Congress should make this article a required reading for all Republican senators and congressmen so they will get the idea that freedom is not free, and in this case and many others, defending Ukraine is not charity. ~llaw

Euromaidan Press

Western aid to Ukraine is not charity, it’s self-preservation

Aid to Ukraine is paramount in all “manageable balance” scenarios of the Russian invasion, whether exhaustion of Russian troops or talks

by Silvester Nosenko

27/07/2024

Western aid to Ukraine is not charity, it’s self-preservation

Will the West continue to support Ukraine?

The ongoing Russian-Ukrainian war has shifted from consolidating Western unity to posing a potential threat of direct conflict with Moscow.

This evolution raises complex questions about Western involvement. Rather than asking, “How can we help Ukraine defeat a nuclear power without triggering a world war?” — a query that seems increasingly difficult to answer — we should reframe our approach. The more pertinent question is: “How can the West avoid losing to a nuclear power, and is Ukraine essential in this effort?”

To address this, we must consider various scenarios that fall short of global war. These can be broadly categorized into two approaches:

  1. Passive strategies, while less costly in terms of resources, may lead to strategic defeat even if direct confrontation is avoided.
  2. Active approaches, on the other hand, offer more preferable and sustainable long-term outcomes.

The critical factor distinguishing these strategies is the level of Western assistance to Ukraine.

Facts and context

The disparity in military spending between Ukraine and Russia has widened significantly in 2024. Ukraine’s budget stands at $40.7 billion, while Russia’s has surged to $115 billion. This gap has grown since 2022, when the figures were $44 billion and $86.3 billion, respectively.

Russia’s commitment to defense is even more striking in the long term. Reuters reports that Moscow plans to allocate $600 billion to defense and security from 2022 to 2025, suggesting further increases in military expenditure that will far outpace Ukraine’s capabilities.

Despite Kyiv’s apparent success in halting a new Russian offensive in the Kharkiv area, this situation poses significant challenges for Ukraine’s strained armed forces and struggling economy. The pledged minimum of $40 billion per annum in assistance from NATO countries is likely insufficient to tilt the balance in Ukraine’s favor or achieve clear political goals in the near future.

Potential outcomes: passive stance and strategic defeat

A scarcity of aid could significantly impact Russia’s perception of Western resolve. This might encourage the Kremlin to adopt more aggressive tactics, including attempts to seize additional territory and coercing Ukraine into concessions through persistent missile strikes

Such actions could lead to internal destabilization in Ukraine, undermining its role as an effective deterrent against Russian aggression. Consequently, closing the capability gap between Kyiv and Moscow would require a substantial increase in Western spending.

In that case, escalation management will be totally out of reach for the West — which is no less dangerous than escalation on the part of Ukraine (for instance, strikes on Russian oil refineries) as it will necessitate hastily organized talks on heavily unfavorable starting terms.

The West faces a dilemma in these potential negotiations:

  1. Non-participation would force acquiescence to outcomes determined by others.
  2. Direct participation would legitimize Russian gains, potentially eroding trust in Western-led security partnerships and the rules-based international order.

Attempts to later promote these principles by supporting what remains of Ukraine would likely prove ineffective. Even initiatives like Zelenskyy’s Peace Formula may be inadequate to address such a complex situation.

The consequences of Ukraine’s defeat could extend beyond the immediate conflict. China, with its significant influence over Russia and importance to the EU, could gain diplomatic leverage. This might pave the way for China’s increased security role in Eastern Europe, contrary to US interests.

Furthermore, if the Western stance lacks cohesion and the US shifts its focus elsewhere, the EU’s security and stability could be compromised. The EU is not equipped to be the primary security provider in such a scenario. History has shown that leaving Ukraine to be handled solely by Europeans, as attempted with the Minsk agreements in 2014, is not an effective strategy.

Active stance: an imperfect but manageable balance

The current scenario of gradual and prolonged exhaustion of Russian troops without settlement, while less sustainable than in previous years, remains viable with consistent Western support. This approach could lead to negotiations based on either Russia’s relative advantage or mutual exhaustion – both preferable to Ukraine’s outright defeat.

To secure favorable preconditions for potential talks, Ukraine requires constant and predictable aid. This support serves two crucial purposes:

  1. It reduces Russia’s perceived benefits of continuing the conflict.
  2. It prevents Moscow from imposing maximalist terms when Kyiv has no alternatives to negotiation.

Consequently, the transition to “peace” becomes more manageable.

If a settlement is reached through mutual exhaustion and relatively equal negotiations, its sustainability will hinge on an appropriate balance of forces. Achieving this balance requires Western assistance and should begin immediately.

Thus, military aid to Ukraine is not as an endless expense, but as both a precondition and foundation for an imperfect yet manageable future.

Beyond the Ukrainian context, broader considerations are crucial. Russian nuclear brinkmanship and threats to Central European states are likely to persist, regardless of Ukraine’s fate. This was evident in Moscow’s pre-invasion ultimatums to NATO. Therefore, sacrificing Ukraine would not necessarily prevent nuclear war threats.

The more significant concern, as Randall Schweller suggests, is the risk of underbalancing against Russia’s further belligerence in Europe. 

While some may argue that the West has previously demonstrated its ability to curb Moscow’s ambitions, citing Cold War experiences, the current situation differs significantly. During the Cold War, American-Soviet relations in Europe resembled a balance between two status quo powers. In contrast, today’s Russia is clearly revisionist, willing to take greater risks and mount offensive actions.

The West, meanwhile, has not fully embraced a deterrence-by denial strategy despite advocating for it more strongly since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. NATO allies still require time and resources to build a force of 300,000 troops at high readiness for the eastern flank.

In the interim, Ukraine’s 1,000,000-strong army serves as a de facto response force, providing a buffer that spares the West from having to significantly increase its own deterrent capabilities, which might lack both capacity and credibility.

Aid to Ukraine necessary to avoid West’s strategic defeat

Aid to Ukraine is a crucial factor in all “manageable balance” scenarios of the Russian invasion, including:

  1. Gradual and prolonged exhaustion of Russian troops without settlement
  2. Negotiations based on relative Russian advantage
  3. Talks resulting from mutual exhaustion
  4. Maintenance of any post-war settlement that may be reached.

Continued assistance to Ukraine not only makes these scenarios viable but also helps the West avoid a strategic defeat and its consequent repercussions.

While the likelihood of a decisive victory in this war remains low, maintaining or enhancing Ukraine’s current position appears more favorable when considering the logic of transitivity of preferences. This approach provides the West with more significant influence over the conflict’s outcome without exposing it to additional risks.

Sacrificing Ukraine to avoid a nuclear war offers questionable benefits: Russian nuclear threats will likely persist even if the “Ukraine question” is resolved in Moscow’s favor.

Regarding conventional capabilities, Russia may require substantial time to recover from its losses. While this prospect may seem reassuring for the West, recent events suggest caution. Russia’s retreat from several Ukrainian regions in 2022 and the subsequent course of the war indicate that Russia’s recovery period might be shorter than anticipated, potentially posing additional threats to European security.

Ukraine has become an integral part of the Western-led security architecture in Europe. This framework has the potential to return to a manageable state of normalcy or even improve compared to the pre-2022 situation. Alternative scenarios risk dangerous global shifts that could jeopardize our collective security and are, therefore, best avoided.

This text is part of the project “Pragmatic Dialogue with the West: Why It Is Worth Supporting Ukraine,” undertaken with the support of the International Renaissance Foundation. It presents the views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the position of the International Renaissance Foundation.

Silvester Nosenko

Silvester Nosenko, Senior Lecturer at the Department of International Relations, Kyiv Mohyla Academy, Translator to the President of Ukraine (2020-2022)


Subscribe

ABOUT THE FOLLOWING ACCESS TO “LLAW’S ALL THINGS NUCLEAR” RELATED MEDIA:

There are 7 categories, with the latest (#7) being a Friday weekly roundup of IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) global nuclear news stories. Also included is a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcanic and caldera activity around the world that play an important role in humanity’s lives. The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). The Categories are listed below in their usual order:

  1. All Things Nuclear
  2. Nuclear Power
  3. Nuclear Power Emergencies
  4. Nuclear War
  5. Nuclear War Threats
  6. Yellowstone Caldera (Note: There are three Yellowstone Caldera bonus stories available in this evening’s Post.)
  7. IAEA Weekly News (Friday’s only)

Whenever there is an underlined link to a Category media news story, if you press or click on the link provided, you no longer have to cut and paste to your web browser, since this Post’s link will take you directly to the article in your browser.

A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.

TODAY’S NUCLEAR WORLD’S NEWS, Saturday, (07/27/2024)

All Things Nuclear

NEWS

Biden to nominate nuclear engineer, Senate staffer, to fill last NRC vacancy

ExchangeMonitor

… things to prepare the NRC for a surge in new nuclear reactor models. … All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings | Diversity …

Is there a sunken nuclear bomb near Florida? Here’s what to know – ClickOrlando.com

ClickOrlando.com

… nuclear bomb in tow, heading out to meet … Copyright 2024 by WKMG ClickOrlando – All rights reserved. About the Author. Anthony Talcott headshot …

Rare astronomical event expected to occur soon – WUNC

WUNC

So a nova is when you have a pair of stars orbiting each other, and about half of all stars, unlike our Sun, are found to be orbiting a companion star …

Nuclear Power

NEWS

IEA Scenarios and the Outlook for Nuclear Power

World Nuclear Association

The energy projections produced by the International Energy Agency (IEA) are frequently consulted by policymakers, the media, and analysts.

Growing US nuclear power resurgence reaches the nation’s heartland – Straight Arrow News

Straight Arrow News

nuclear power comeback is starting to take shape in the U.S. as officials consider reopening the Duane Arnold Energy Center in Iowa.

Second-to-last nuclear reactor shut down – Taipei Times

Taipei Times

Second-to-last nuclear reactor shut down. GAS BOOST: An LNG unit would buttress the shortfall from the closure, and could generate more power than Ma- …

Nuclear Power Emergencies

NEWS

Officials investigate blaze at nuclear power plant | News | baycitytribune.com

The Bay City Tribune

Officials investigate blaze at nuclear power plant. By … “An Unusual Event is the lowest of four nuclear emergency classifications,” she said.

25 states file emergency appeal to pause new EPA regulations – NewsNation

NewsNation

… plant for a next-generation nuclear power plant he believes will “revolutionize” how power is generated. (AP Photo/Natalie Behring, File). Get fact …

Nuclear War

NEWS

The unacceptable, growing risk of nuclear war – The Boston Globe

The Boston Globe

The unacceptable, growing risk of nuclear war. Leaders of nuclear-armed nations seem unaware of the dangers of their combative talk. But the heads of …

Russian Nuclear-Capable Missile Destroys Zelensky’s ‘Secret’ Depot | Putin | Ukraine War

YouTube

On Camera: Russian Nuclear-Capable Missile Destroys Zelensky’s ‘Secret’ Depot | Putin | Ukraine War. 22K views · 3 hours ago #ukrainesecretweapon …

Russia’s Lavrov says US-South Korea nuclear guideline adds concern, media reports | Reuters

Reuters

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Saturday a recently announced guideline on the operation of U.S. nuclear assets on the Korean …

Nuclear War Threats

NEWS

Chilling US map shows areas most likely to be targeted in a nuclear war – is your state on it?

MSN

The threat of nuclear war looms over parts of America as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and other global conflicts persist.

Western aid to Ukraine is not charity, it’s self-preservation – Euromaidan Press

Euromaidan Press

… risks. Sacrificing Ukraine to avoid a nuclear war offers questionable benefits: Russian nuclear threats will likely persist even if the “Ukraine …

Inside the secret Cold War bunker left abandoned in major UK city with miles of concrete …

The US Sun

BENNY & THE THREATS. Donald Trump warns Netanyahu of ‘World War 3 if he … Completed in 1966, the bunker would have provided refuge for local officials ..

Yellowstone Caldera

NEWS

Yellowstone closes Biscuit Basin for the season following hydrothermal blast | Local News

Wyoming Tribune Eagle

Geology · Earth Sciences · Volcanology · Geological Processes · Water · Volcanism · Diamond · Yellowstone Caldera · Volcano · Volcanic Hazards …

If Yellowstone’s volcanic system erupted, how could it impact the US? – Fox 59

Fox 59

The past 60-80 eruptions would have had little regional (or continental) impact,” they explained. The Yellowstone Volcano Observatory said Yellowstone …

Here’s how a ‘volcanic supereruption’ at Yellowstone might impact life in Colorado

Denver Gazette

… Yellowstone Supereruption,’ published by Yellowstone Volcano Observatory – one showing distribution of ash in each major eruption and another …

LLAW’s All Things Nuclear #703, Friday, (07/26/2024)

“End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity”

Lloyd A. Williams-Pendergraft

Jul 26, 2024

1

Share

Image is of the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant under siege in the Russia/ Ukraine war.

LLAW’s NUCLEAR ISSUES & COMMENTS, Friday, (07/26/2024)

International Atomic Energy Agency

This is just the 2nd week that the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) newsletter is available to the public on this blog. It is available as Category 7 each Friday below at the end of TODAY’S NUCLEAR WORLD’S NEWS, Friday, (07/26/2024). You are invited to peruse the timely (often critical) articles that are provided for your continuing nuclear news, including a weekly update of the Russia/Ukraine war and the dangerous ongoing situation there concerning the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant. I have provided a duplicate link to this report, which is the IAEA’s 193rd Update

(Just the cumulation of updates provides the instant realization of how serious this wartime situation involving a nuclear power plant is and how nuclear power plants are also potential weapons of mass destruction.)

~llaw

The link:

Update 239-IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine


Subscribe

ABOUT THE FOLLOWING ACCESS TO “LLAW’S ALL THINGS NUCLEAR” RELATED MEDIA:

There are 7 categories, with the latest (#7) being a Friday weekly roundup of IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) global nuclear news stories. Also included is a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcanic and caldera activity around the world that play an important role in humanity’s lives. The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). The Categories are listed below in their usual order:

  1. All Things Nuclear
  2. Nuclear Power
  3. Nuclear Power Emergencies
  4. Nuclear War
  5. Nuclear War Threats
  6. Yellowstone Caldera (Note: There are three Yellowstone Caldera bonus stories available in this evening’s Post.)
  7. IAEA Weekly News (Friday’s only)

Whenever there is an underlined link to a Category media news story, if you press or click on the link provided, you no longer have to cut and paste to your web browser, since this Post’s link will take you directly to the article in your browser.

A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.

TODAY’S NUCLEAR WORLD’S NEWS, Friday, (07/26/2024)

All Things Nuclear

NEWS

Should California’s Legislature jump into the debate about nuclear waste at San Onofre?

The Daily Item

Once the dismantlement is complete, all that is expected to remain at SONGS will be two dry storage facilities; a security building with personnel to …

Israel and Hezbollah have escalated attacks on each other. How likely is war? – WVTF

WVTF

All Things Considered · BBC World Service · Fresh Air · Full Disclosure · Here … nuclear reactors, ports, hospitals, schools, everything. And so …

NextEra eyes restart opportunity for shuttered Iowa plant : Corporate – World Nuclear News

World Nuclear News

There are a few things that we would have to work through, but yes, we are. We are looking at it.” The reactor has been defuelled – all of its …

Nuclear Power

NEWS

China Demonstrates the First Entirely Meltdown-Proof Nuclear Reactor – Singularity Hub

Singularity Hub

In a paper, researchers describe a test in which they cut power to a live nuclear plant—and the plant was able to passively cool itself.

Nuclear not a dirty word, but coal is (to some) – Mining.com.au

Mining.com.au

The national conversation about energy has gone nuclear as debate rages about how Australia can transition away from coal-fired power stations and …

China sets launch date for world’s first thorium molten salt nuclear power station

South China Morning Post

A molten salt nuclear power plant that uses thorium as fuel instead of uranium is set to be built in the Gobi Desert.

Nuclear Power Emergencies

NEWS

False alarm at Ohio nuclear plant raises local preparedness questions at Piketon

Scioto Valley Guardian

… Nuclear Power Plant. According to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 14 emergency sirens were inadvertently triggered during routine system …

Ukraine probing emergency exports of thermal coal to Poland – Kyiv – Yahoo News Canada

Yahoo News Canada

… power transmission line from Ukraine’s Khmelnytskyi nuclear plant to Poland. Ukraine and Poland are increasing this year’s production of thermal …

CenterPoint’s new outage tracker, emergency plans unveiled by CEO

AOL.com

… emergencies. The failures we witnessed during Hurricane … Energy Northwest campus, home to the northwest’s only commercial nuclear power plant.

Nuclear War

NEWS

The unacceptable, growing risk of nuclear war – The Boston Globe

The Boston Globe

The last time the world faced the prospect of imminent nuclear war was during the 1962 Cuban missile crisis. It was averted because leaders on both …

Nuclear Risks on the Rise – CounterPunch.org

Counterpunch

There’s a precedent: the outlawing of chemical warfare after World War I when its terrible impacts were horrifically demonstrated, killing 90,000. The …

Will the New Triumvirate, Russia, China & North Korea, Force the South To Go Nuclear?

Global Issues

UNITED NATIONS, Jul 26 (IPS) – When Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un signed a pact last month to revive a Cold War …

Nuclear War Threats

NEWS

Nuclear Risks on the Rise – CounterPunch.org

Counterpunch

… Nuclear Threat to Our Planet, and the Beyond Nuclear handbook, The U.S. Space Force and the dangers of nuclear power and nuclear war in space.

Stabilizing the NATO-Russia Deterrence Relationship

Georgetown Journal of International Affairs

Russia’s Tactical Nuclear Threats. The war in Ukraine has highlighted … attack would be crucial if Russia threatened to use nuclear weapons.

Will the New Triumvirate, Russia, China & North Korea, Force the South To Go Nuclear?

Global Issues

… nuclear threats.” Meeting on the sidelines of a NATO summit in … risks of armed conflict and nuclear war in the region, says Abolition 2000.

Yellowstone Caldera

NEWS

Yellowstone shuts down Biscuit Basin for summer after hydrothermal explosion damaged boardwalk

USA Today

… Yellowstone Caldera Chronicles, a Yellowstone Volcano Observatory publication. While unexpected geological activity at the park can seem like a …

Explosion at Yellowstone National Park forces tourists to run for safety – Yahoo News UK

Yahoo News UK

Yellowstone sits on a dormant volcano, but the explosion – which sent debris an estimated 100 feet into the sky – is not believed to be related to a …

Biscuit Basin Explosion – YouTube

YouTube

… volcano, it’s no surprise that hydrothermal explosions are Yellowstone’s most common geologic hazard. Mike Poland, scientist-in-charge of the …

IAEA Weekly News – 26 July 2024

International Atomic Energy Agency

IAEA Weekly News

26 July 2024

Read the top news and updates published on IAEA.org this week.

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_165x110/public/iaeaflag11140x640.jpg?itok=L8JFAU_6

26 July 2024

Update 239-IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine

The nuclear safety and security situation at the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) remains highly challenging during the military conflict, including efforts to ensure adequate maintenance of key safety systems and other vital equipment, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said today. Over the past week, the IAEA experts stationed at the ZNPP have conducted several walkdowns focused on monitoring maintenance activities across the site, as well as the availability of necessary spare parts for the plant. Read more →

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_165x110/public/csc-group-0724-1140x640.jpg?itok=B-CLV4-H

24 July 2024

Progress as Countries Seek to Join the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage

Progress is being made towards a global nuclear liability regime for nuclear damage, participants heard at the Fourth Meeting of the Contracting Parties and Signatories to the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC), held at the IAEA’s headquarters in Vienna, Austria last month. Read more →

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_165x110/public/hua-liu-al-khatib-1140x640.jpg?itok=yt2FBPxk

23 July 2024

IAEA Deepens Ties with the United Nations Office for South-South Cooperation

The IAEA and the United Nations Office for South-South Cooperation will launch a new series of joint activities to enhance collaboration, following an agreement signed during the recent UN High Level Political Forum in New York. Read more →

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_165x110/public/grossi-meloni.jpg?itok=VhCqaaqN

22 July 2024

First Ministerial Meeting of the IAEA World Fusion Energy Group to be held in Italy in November

The IAEA and Italy – the current Group of Seven presidency – will co-host the inaugural ministerial meeting of the World Fusion Energy Group later this year to inject further momentum into intensifying global efforts to develop a potentially clean, safe and limitless source of energy. Read more →

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/styles/thumbnail_165x110/public/ra-226-drums-1140x640.png?itok=7o0rspp4

22 July 2024

Recycling Radioactive Sources to Support Cancer Treatments

Canada will recycle disused radioactive sources from Thailand in order to support innovative cancer treatments, as part of an international IAEA initiative. Read more →

LLAW’s All Things Nuclear #702, Thursday, (07/25/2024)

“End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity”

LLOYD A. WILLIAMS-PENDERGRAFT

JUL 25, 2024

1

Share

Why getting rid of nuclear weapons must be a priority

LLAW’s NUCLEAR ISSUES & COMMENTS, Thursday, (07/25/2024)

Twenty five years ago, the idea of nuclear disarmament was a possibility. Today it is not. Going from five to nine nuclear armed countries, and Iran perhaps close to making it ten, just using simple arithmetic tells us such a cooperative agreement among nations is at least twice as difficult as it was then, so what makes anyone believe it might be a possibility now? Nevertheless, this short and well-written article is very much worth reading, as parallels many of my own issues and comments over the those years when I quietly stepped out the nuclear industry over the 3-Mile Island partial meltdown, which, by the way is still undergoing a ‘clean-up’ operation that won’t be finished until 2037 (if then), and yet the ownership is considering an attempt to re-start the plant. Insanity continues to prevail, as always, in ‘all things nuclear” . . .

As I said yesterday, following a similar negative comment about China’s valiant proposal to rid Earth’s World(s) of nuclear weapons, as well as nuclear power, “Wouldn’t it be wonderful if I was wrong?” ~llaw

File:The Statesman.png - Wikimedia Commons

Why getting rid of nuclear weapons must be a priority

A little over a quarter century ago when the book Third Millennium Equipoise came out with its final blueprint for ridding the world of nuclear weapons linked to UN Security Council reforms, there were only five countries that possessed nuclear weapons.

VINOD SAIGHAL | New Delhi | July 25, 2024 8:00 am

A little over a quarter century ago when the book Third Millennium Equipoise came out with its final blueprint for ridding the world of nuclear weapons linked to UN Security Council reforms, there were only five countries that possessed nuclear weapons. They were also the five permanent members of the Security Council. Today there are nine countries possessing nuclear weapons. In the 78 years since the nuclear strikes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki no leader of consequence had threatened use of nuclear strikes in the manner of the threat given by the Russian leader Vladimir Putin in the Ukraine war.

He has threatened to use these in the event of serious Russian losses due to the supply of advanced weapons to Ukraine. It has to be noted that he appears to be deliberately over reacting since there is no threat in the war to loss of territory in Russia. He will use nuclear weapons if he loses Crimea and his enclaves in Donbas. Putin may not actually be intending to carry out the nuclear threat but his adversaries in the West cannot take these threats casually. Automatically certain states of readiness to meet the threats take place. What is more, based on the Russian threat, nuclear powers have started refining and in some cases augmenting their nuclear arsenals making the world a more dangerous place to live in. While Russia may have the capability to invade parts of Europe, the West has neither the capacity nor the desire to invade Russia.

Therefore the nuclear sabre rattling by Putin makes no sense. Carrying the argument further in case of Russian setbacks, where exactly would he carry out a nuclear strike? Certainly not in Europe which would invite retaliatory nuclear strikes on Russia with consequences too horrible to contemplate. That limits the choice to strikes in Ukraine. But where? Wherever he strikes there is a strong possibility that the largest nuclear reactor in Europe at Zaporizzhia will also go up in flames, again with far reaching consequences in the whole of Ukraine and large parts of Europe and Russia. The discussion above brings home to every human being with terrifying clarity that among eight billion or so people who share the planet, the potential inheres in just one person or leader to endanger the fragility of the beautiful Pale Blue Dot that we inhabit.

That being the case and having lived through the nuclear menace for over seven decades through Cold War doctrines like MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) and the like, the world cannot continue to skate on thin ice for its future and safety both of which are amenable to annihilation on the calculations, whims or fancy of a single human being. Today the capacity for largescale country or global destruction inheres in two nations, the United States and the Russian Federation with nuclear arsenals comprising 5044 and 5580 weapons respectively sufficient for second, third and fourth strike capability. No other nuclear state has the weapons numbers to cause damage nearing that of the two world powers. Having said that, all of them continue to increase their nuclear weapon holdings. Taking the case of the two superpowers, should they decide to wage war on each other they can devastate each other’s countries to the extent of reducing them to gigantic Chernobyls.

That is to say they will cease to exist as viable states for up to fifty or even hundred years. To do so they would hardly have used more than twenty per cent of their megaton range weapons stockpile. To what effect would this near total mutual assured destruction take place? There would be no victory, only mutual annihilation. Therefore where is the rationale in the first instance of holding such large stockpiles and refining them? Surely they have no plans, or possibly have no plans to use them on other nations in similar numbers. Most importantly why would Russia want to destroy America or the US Russia? Russian people admire America and given a chance half of them would like to migrate there. Likewise Americans do not dislike Russian people.

They admire them. Therefore the question arises in a MAD type of scenario – who is destroying whom and on whose behalf? The same applies to a possible exchange between China and the US. Would their nationals want the destruction of their opposite numbers? Once these aspects are discussed in open forums and universities around the world, the absurdity of holding nuclear weapons globally would automatically lead to their abandonment. The fifty year blueprint once outlined for ridding the world of nuclear weapons keeping in mind mutual and equal security for lead nuclear states during phased reduction will have to be scaled down to a quarter century or so.

Prior to that aspects of monitoring under UN auspices will need to be streamlined. The elimination of nuclear weapons has to be the foremost global priority with immediate effect. The first step would have to be the passage of this resolution in the UN General Assembly followed by a similar resolution in the UN Security Council.

(The writer, a retired Major General of the Indian Army, is the author of Third Millenium Equipoise.)


Subscribe

ABOUT THE FOLLOWING ACCESS TO “LLAW’S ALL THINGS NUCLEAR” RELATED MEDIA:

There are 7 categories, with the latest (#7) being a Friday weekly roundup of IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) global nuclear news stories. Also included is a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcanic and caldera activity around the world that play an important role in humanity’s lives. The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). The Categories are listed below in their usual order:

  1. All Things Nuclear
  2. Nuclear Power
  3. Nuclear Power Emergencies
  4. Nuclear War
  5. Nuclear War Threats
  6. Yellowstone Caldera (Note: There are three Yellowstone Caldera bonus stories available in this evening’s Post.)
  7. IAEA Weekly News (Friday’s only)

Whenever there is an underlined link to a Category media news story, if you press or click on the link provided, you no longer have to cut and paste to your web browser, since this Post’s link will take you directly to the article in your browser.

A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.

TODAY’S NUCLEAR WORLD’S NEWS, Thursday, (07/25/2024)

All Things Nuclear

NEWS

Wayne Brady’s nontraditional home life redefines today’s modern family in new reality series – ABC7

ABC7

Because people think it’s all smiles and shiny. … And that’s what we want you to take away from it, because that that is the remix of a nuclear family …

The US nuclear industry is stuck. Can this startup get it rolling again? – Canary Media

Canary Media

You have to do things at fleet scale.” Jonathan Webb, founder of … nuclear projects have almost all been over budget and behind schedule.

NextEra considers restarting Iowa nuclear plant amid rising demand for carbon-free energy

CNBC

“The existing nuclear plants are the hottest thing in power right now … All Rights Reserved. A Division of NBCUniversal. Data is a real-time …

Nuclear Power

NEWS

The US nuclear industry is stuck. Can this startup get it rolling again? – Canary Media

Canary Media

Can America regain its nuclear energy dominance? The U.S. has the world’s largest nuclear power fleet and generates more electricity from fission …

World’s first ‘meltdown-proof’ nuclear reactor aces safety test – New Atlas

New Atlas

Generation IV reactors like the Shidao Bay Nuclear Power Plant high-temperature gas-cooled (HTGR) pebble-bed reactor in Shidao Bay, Shandong Province, …

Australia should wait for SMR market to mature, report says – World Nuclear News

World Nuclear News

As current coal-fired power stations begin to retire there is an urgent need for mature, low carbon technologies to fill the energy supply gap, the …

Nuclear Power Emergencies

NEWS

Emergency alarms go off around Ohio nuclear plant; here’s what happened – WHIO TV

WHIO TV

The emergency alarms started blaring around the Perry Nuclear Power Plant.

‘Unusual event’ declared at nuclear power plant in Matagorda County – FOX 26 Houston

FOX 26 Houston

The incident was followed by a fire in the switchyard, which prompted immediate action from on-site crews. Local county emergency response teams and …

Ashtabula County residents get scare after nuclear plant’s emergency notification system …

Cleveland 19 News

The emergency …

Nuclear War

NEWS

Russia and Chinese nuclear-capable bombers patrol near United States | Reuters

Reuters

Russian and Chinese nuclear-capable strategic bombers patrolled near the U.S. state of Alaska in the North Pacific and Arctic on Thursday, …

Mike Bond’s Latest Thriller, CRUDE: Nuclear War is Coming — Can We Stop It? |

Baxley News Banner

(NewsUSA) – “After many years working on intelligence and war issues, I now believe we’re about to have a worldwide nuclear war.

Ukraine-Russia war: US intercepts Russian and Chinese bombers – Sky News

Sky News

Russia and China have held joint air patrols near Alaska, prompting US and Canadian defence command to intercept four bombers.

Nuclear War Threats

NEWS

Why getting rid of nuclear weapons must be a priority – The Statesman

The Statesman

… threatened use of nuclear strikes in the manner of the threat given by the Russian leader Vladimir Putin in the Ukraine war. He has threatened to …

Risk of atomic Armageddon: US must restore military deterrence against Iran – opinion

The Jerusalem Post

… Threat of War Is the Only Way to Achieve Peace with Iran. Tehran no longer takes Washington seriously. To revive the nuclear deal, the threat of …

Ukraine-Russia war: US intercepts Russian and Chinese bombers – Sky News

Sky News

… threats of invading Taiwan … There have also been warnings more than one of them risks triggering a third world war within the next five years.

Yellowstone Caldera

NEWS

Yellowstone National Park explosion: What is a hydrothermal explosion? – USA Today

USA Today

Hydrothermal explosions are not an indicator a volcanic eruption is brewing, according to USGS. There is a supervolcano roughly the size of Rhode …

Don’t Panic: The Yellowstone Explosion Isn’t Tied To Its Supervolcano – Forbes

Forbes

A hydrothermal explosion at Yellowstone National Park Tuesday sent steam and debris into the air, freaked out a number of tourists and damaged a …

Is Yellowstone National Park closed? What to know after hydrothermal explosion

Cincinnati Enquirer

Is Yellowstone a volcano? Will it erupt soon? … Yellowstone is home to some of the planet’s most active volcanic, hydrothermal and earthquake systems, …