End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity” ~llaw
Aug 07, 2025
On My Mind Today:
Donald J. Trump and “all things nuclear” that he has questionable influence and access to as the President of the United States of America. He is unnecessarily creating a global world of fear. ~llaw
*Although I think it would take more than a “two-person” rule as stated in the “Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists” article below . . .


Donald Trump can become a global hero by adopting the ‘two-person rule’ for nuclear weapons use
By John Mecklin | August 6, 2025
These two locks were part of the implementation of the two-person-rule in a Minuteman ICBM launch control capsule. Photo by Craftsman2001; released into public domain by author.
Share
The 80th anniversaries of the first test and subsequent first uses of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki have inspired an array of public displays of concern about the current, inordinately dangerous state of nuclear affairs. Those displays have ranged from the journalistic (I found the project that dominated the August issue of The Atlantic particularly well-done) to thought-leader gatherings like the Nobel Laureates Assembly for the Prevention of Nuclear War, recently concluded in at the University of Chicago, and on to governmental offerings such as a series of speeches late in July by Democratic members of the House of Representatives about the danger of nuclear war.
There is a two-part assertion underlying most of these efforts: Nuclear war is an ever-present threat that could extinguish human civilization in an afternoon; and too little public attention is focused on the threat, so leaders devote too little effort to reducing it.
These assertions are true but incomplete. The possibility of nuclear war—whether begun intentionally, accidentally, or by misapprehension—is not just a problem, or a mere dilemma, or a challenging conundrum, but something akin to Winston Churchill’s description of Russia as a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma. It is hard even to imagine the practical way out of a situation in which the leader of any of nine nuclear weapons countries could instigate Armageddon, killing billions of people and leaving the planet an environmental hellhole. The nine-sided game called “Deterrence” (or, if you prefer, “Mutually Assured Destruction”) can have no winner, unless all nine members of the nuclear club agree never to play. And a practical way of throwing the game into the dust bin of history has eluded committed arms control and disarmament advocates for decades.
I have sat through many a meeting in which learned experts bemoaned a lack, today, of the kind of engaged mass public that encouraged US and Soviet leaders to address the nuclear weapons threat in the 1980s. In those meetings—and in countless think-tank panels and other policy symposia over the decades—well-meaning governmental officials and committed citizens have suggested that the public get the ‘80s nuclear fever again and force leaders to take actions that would reduce the risk of nuclear war. (Let me not exempt myself from membership in the suggestion-making industrial complex; every year for the past decade, I have helped the Bulletin’s Science and Security Board craft its Doomsday Clock statement, which invariably includes suggestions on what world leaders should and could do, if they were really concerned about a nuclear conflagration that would make Hiroshima and Nagasaki seem trivial.)
But 2025 is not the mid-1980s. Even if history sometimes throws a useful rhyme or two our way, it does not repeat itself exactly. From the mid-1980s through the early 1990s, the world had leaders—Gorbachev, Reagan, and George H.W. Bush—who responded to the currents of their times and took extraordinary measures to reduce the threat of nuclear war. Certainly, mass protests had their effect. But there were many forces at play during the years surrounding the dissolution of the Soviet Union that led to what seemed, then, an end to an idiotic Cold War. The change wasn’t just about demonstrators or public opinion. It required leaders who understood the times and took the chance before them to make extraordinary, positive history.
Atoms and Arroyos: The photographic legacy of Berlyn Brixner
Today, we have a different world situation, with leaders who differ markedly from those who tried to end the Cold War. And the nuclear situation is more perilous now than then. It is 89 seconds to midnight, with a clicking Doomsday Clock, a worldwide nuclear modernization craze in process, and Russian and US officials carelessly playing around with nuclear rhetoric and signaling-by-submarine.
So, on this 80th anniversary of the two atomic bombings that started this age of nuclear terror, I will not urge citizens into the streets or recount all that they and their leaders could do to reduce the nuclear threat. Instead, let me suggest one action that one man could take that would, I believe, dramatically reduce the likelihood of nuclear war—instantly.
Donald Trump could sign up to the two-person rule.
Over time, many concerned experts and government officials have suggested variations on what should be a self-evident truth: No one person should have the power—what is often called the “sole authority”—to end human civilization; any decision to use nuclear weapons should, as a matter of simple common sense, require the agreement of two or more people. It’s a general notion that, Stanford University expert Scott Sagan notes, has come to be known in common parlance as the two-person rule.
Right now, in the Senate, the Restricting First Use of Nuclear Weapons Act of 2025, introduced by Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts and co-sponsored by six other senators,[1] sits at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. A companion measure[2] was introduced by Rep. Ted Lieu of California; it sits in the House Foreign Affairs and Armed Services committees. Also, the Nuclear First-Strike Security Act of 2025, introduced by Rep. Scott Peters of California and co-sponsored by eight other House members,[3] sits in the House Armed Services Committee.
These bills offer reasonable options for making sure a US president cannot, by himself, start a nuclear war, and they provide reasonable allowances for quick response in situations in which an adversary has launched a nuclear attack against the United States or its allies. But the sponsors and co-sponsors of these bills are all Democrats (with the exception of Bernie Sanders, an independent who caucuses with Democrats). Only a fully blinkered optimist could expect those bills—or any others that seek to constrain President Trump, a Republican with a seemingly iron grip on congressional Republicans—to pass Congress, much less be signed into law.
But no sane person of either major American political party wants to see the world incinerated. Certainly, Donald Trump knows of the terrible danger of nuclear weapons; he has commented on that danger frequently over decades. In February he put it succinctly, saying that if nuclear weapons were ever used “that’s going to be probably oblivion.”
“Tremendous amounts of money are being spent on nuclear, and the destructive capability is something that we don’t even want to talk about …. So, we want to see if we can denuclearize, and I think that’s very possible,” he said.
ABOUT THE FOLLOWING ACCESS TO “LLAW’s All Nuclear Daily Digest” RELATED MEDIA”:
There are 7 categories, including a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcanic and caldera activity around the world that also play an important role in the survival of human and other life.
The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). The Categories are listed below in their usual order:
- All Things Nuclear
- Nuclear Power
- Nuclear Power Emergencies
- Nuclear War Threats
- Nuclear War
- Yellowstone Caldera (Note: There are two Yellowstone Caldera bonus stories available in today’s Post.)
- IAEA News (Friday’s only) (NOTE: It’s back!)
A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.
TODAY’S ALL NUCLEAR WORLD’S NEWS, Thursday, (08/07/2025)
All Things Nuclear
NEWS
Why is Donald Trump posting about Sydney Sweeney and Nuclear Submarines? – YouTube
YouTube
… about nuclear submarines were all about. Subscribe here: http://bit.ly/1rbfUog For more news, analysis and features visit: www.bbc.com/news …
Hiroshima survivors fear rising nuclear threat on the 80th anniversary of atomic bombing
WVTF
All Things Considered. Next Up: 6:00 PM Marketplace. 0:00. 0:00. All Things … about the growing support of global leaders for nuclear weapons as a …
Annie Jacobsen on Nuclear War, Intelligence Operations, and Conspiracy Realities (Ep. 250)
Conversations with Tyler
Tyler and Annie explore whether we should be more afraid of nuclear weapons or if fear itself raises the risks, who should advise presidents during …
Nuclear Power
NEWS
NASA Is Getting Fired Up About a Nuclear Reactor on the Moon – The New York Times
The New York Times
Placing an atomic energy source on the lunar surface is “not science fiction,” experts say, but does pose technical challenges.
US eyes 7% more nuclear power through restarts, upgrades | Reuters
Reuters
Restarts and uprates could hike U.S. nuclear power capacity by 7 GW by the end of the decade at lower risk and cost than building new reactors.
S&P 500 Nuclear Leaders Report Earnings As Stock Market Nuke Fever Spreads
Investor’s Business Daily
S&P 500 components Constellation Energy and Vistra reported Q2 earnings Thursday as nuclear-related stocks are moving higher in stock market …
Nuclear Power Emergencies
NEWS
Xcel to replace nuclear plant sirens with mobile phone alerts | Monticello Times
Hometown Source
MONTICELLO — Residents near Minnesota’s two nuclear power plants — including the local facility in Monticello — will soon receive emergency alerts …
Coag as irrelevantal and the anatomy of Trump’s energy emergency – POLITICO
Politico
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum (left) and Energy Secretary Chris Wright deliver remarks outside the · Steam rises from a a cooling tower at the nuclear …
Micro nuclear reactors poised to power mines and factories as safety debate flares
The Daily Climate
… emergency planning, is just madness.” — Ed Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists. Why this matters: Micro …
Nuclear War Threats
NEWS
NATO country issues nuclear war warning – Newsweek
Newsweek
… nuclear war “cannot be won and must never be fought,” as Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul condemned growing threats to the global nuclear order.
Renewed nuclear threats cast shadow over Hiroshima anniversary – YouTube
YouTube
Renewed nuclear threats cast shadow over Hiroshima anniversary. 11K … Israel-Gaza War: Israel’s Netanyahu Reportedly Plans Full Occupation of Gaza | ..
America is prepared for a strike on our nuclear weapons – The Hill
The Hill
America’s nuclear command, control, and communications system is resilient and prepared for nuclear threats, despite vulnerabilities … war, should a …
Nuclear War
NEWS
Russia & US Marching Towards Nuclear War? | WION | GRAVITAS Highlights – YouTube
YouTube
… War‑era arms control. With nuclear submarines at sea, warheads back on British soil, and new missiles coming to Germany, Cold War danger has …
The witnesses of the first nuclear bomb | The Take – YouTube
YouTube
What is the threat of nuclear war today? With tensions on the rise, a new telling of firsthand accounts of the creation of the atomic bomb and the …
My entertaining Conversation with Annie Jacobsen – Marginal REVOLUTION
Marginal REVOLUTION
This was Schelling in an interview with WGBH Radio in 1986 in Boston. He says, “The problem with applying game theory to nuclear war is that nuclear …
Nuclear War
NEWS
NATO Country Issues Nuclear War Warning as Russia-US Tensions Escalate – Newsweek
Newsweek
Germany marked the 80th anniversary of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings with a stark warning that nuclear war “cannot be won and must never be …
Russia and the US have only one nuclear arms pact left. What does it mean? | AP News
AP News
While the end of nuclear weapons agreements between the U.S. and Russia does not necessarily make nuclear war more likely, “it certainly doesn’t make …
Trump Moves “Nuclear” Subs: Negotiating Tactic or Escalatory Gamble? – CSIS
CSIS
Russian attack submarines can carry nuclear weapons in addition to their conventional weapons. Thus, they are considered “dual-capable.” Russia and …
Yellowstone Caldera
NEWS
No, Yellowstone Animals Aren’t Fleeing: Scientists Debunk Viral Supervolcano Rumors
Dailyfly News
Michael Poland, scientist-in-charge of Yellowstone Volcano Observatory at the U.S. Geological Survey, said there were undertones in the false claims …
Animals aren’t fleeing Yellowstone National Park in droves; the claims are baseless – PolitiFact
PolitiFact
Other TikTok posts suggested that animals could be fleeing because of a possible Yellowstone supervolcano eruption, but the U.S. Geological Survey …




![r/QuotesPorn - “I know not with what weapons WWIII will be fought, but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones.”-Albert Einstein [1023 x 625] r/QuotesPorn - “I know not with what weapons WWIII will be fought, but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones.”-Albert Einstein [1023 x 625]](https://i0.wp.com/substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_%21yF43%21%2Cw_1456%2Cc_limit%2Cf_auto%2Cq_auto%3Agood%2Cfl_progressive%3Asteep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fdf8437c7-1dd0-4ea0-a60d-bd2447575a42_640x391.jpeg?w=525&ssl=1)
![r/QuotesPorn - “I know not with what weapons WWIII will be fought, but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones.”-Albert Einstein [1023 x 625] r/QuotesPorn - “I know not with what weapons WWIII will be fought, but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones.”-Albert Einstein [1023 x 625]](https://i0.wp.com/substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_%21f3ff%21%2Cw_1456%2Cc_limit%2Cf_auto%2Cq_auto%3Agood%2Cfl_progressive%3Asteep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff06952e8-177b-48d5-bcec-d060acb7114b_640x391.jpeg?w=525&ssl=1)














