“End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity” ~llaw
Feb 28, 2025
The Pershing II, a mobile intermediate-range ballistic missile, is transported into Hanger C on Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida, Oct. 29, 2020. (U.S. Space Force Photo By Airman Thomas Sjoberg)
LLAW’s NUCLEAR WORLD NEWS TODAY with the RISKS and CONSEQUENCES of TOMORROW
In My Opinion:
The following article from the “Brookings Institute” and author Michael E. O’Hanlon (see his brief resume at the end of the article), tells us why we should never implicitly trust AI to do the right thing. No matter how smart it eventually becomes, it will only be as good as human intelligence makes it to be, but it will always lack the kind of innate common sense, abstract thinking, and emotional compassion that the three potential AI failures, had it existed during those incidents, highlighted in the story.
I also believe that no one individual should ever be the sole judge of whether to use nuclear weapons of mass destruction, and that wherever AI could fail, so might the individual who might well have little more common sense than AI might have. I already have at least one highly placed individual in mind, and his intelligence is, to my own common sense, also “artificial” in its way, and extremely questionable. ~llaw
Commentary
How unchecked AI could trigger a nuclear war
Michael E. O’Hanlon
February 28, 2025
The Pershing II, a mobile intermediate-range ballistic missile, is transported into Hanger C on Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida, Oct. 29, 2020. (U.S. Space Force Photo By Airman Thomas Sjoberg)
- 8 min read
- Michael E. O’Hanlon
Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Joe Biden agreed late in 2024 that artificial intelligence (AI) should never be empowered to decide to launch a nuclear war. The groundwork for this excellent policy decision was laid over five years of discussions at the Track II U.S.-China Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence and National Security convened by the Brookings Institution and Tsinghua University’s Center for International Security and Strategy. By examining several cases from the U.S.-Soviet rivalry during the Cold War, one can see what might have happened if AI had existed back in that period and been trusted with the job of deciding to launch nuclear weapons or to preempt an anticipated nuclear attack—and had been wrong in its decisionmaking. Given the prevailing ideas, doctrines, and procedures of the day, an AI system “trained” on that information (perhaps through the use of many imaginary scenarios that reflected the current conventional wisdom) might have decided to launch nuclear weapons, with catastrophic results.
Thankfully, in the examples I will consider—the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, the September 1983 false-alarm crisis, and the October 1983 Able Archer exercise—a human being showed greater awareness of the stakes and better common sense than the received wisdom and doctrine of the day. It would be imprudent to assume that humans will always show restraint in such situations, and that well-trained AI systems may provide useful inputs to human decisions. Nevertheless, it is sobering that when facing the real possibility of nuclear Armageddon, human beings exhibited a level of thoughtfulness and compassion that machines, trained in cold-blooded “rational” ways, might not have possessed at the time and might not possess in the future.
Three close calls with nuclear Armageddon
The Cuban missile crisis began when U.S. intelligence learned that the Soviet Union was shipping nuclear-capable missiles and tactical nuclear weapons to Cuba over the course of 1962, in an attempt to improve the nuclear balance with the United States. Even though they did not know the extent to which the Soviets already had nuclear weapons on Cuban soil, almost all of President John F. Kennedy’s advisors, including the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recommended conventional air strikes against the Soviet positions. Such strikes could easily have led to Soviet escalation, perhaps by nearby Soviet submarine commanders (armed with nuclear-tipped torpedoes) against U.S. warships, or by Soviet ground troops in Cuba (perhaps against the U.S. base at Guantanamo Bay). Kennedy opted for a combination of a naval quarantine of Cuba (to prevent any more weaponry from reaching the island by sea) and quiet backdoor diplomacy with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev that included offers to remove American missiles from Turkey and to never invade Cuba. The Soviets were persuaded to take this deal, withdraw their missiles and nuclear weapons from Cuba, and halt any further military buildup on the island, then run by Fidel Castro and his government.
In the September 1983 false-alarm crisis, a single Soviet watch officer, Stanislav Petrov, saw indications from sensor systems that the United States was attacking the Soviet Union with five intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) that would detonate within perhaps 20 minutes. In fact, what the sensors had picked up were reflections of sunlight from unusual cloud formations; the sensors were not “smart” enough to recognize the reflections for what they really were. Realizing that any American attack on the Soviet Union would almost certainly be much larger—since a small attack would only provoke a Soviet retaliation and have little chance of causing meaningful damage to Soviet nuclear forces—Petrov single-handedly chose not to escalate the situation by recommending “retaliation” against the perceived American strike. Whether an AI system would have reached that same prudent conclusion, when prevailing doctrine said that any incoming attack likely required immediate retaliation, is anyone’s guess. In this case, the actual human being improvised, using instinct more than formal protocol, to arrive at the correct decision when faced with the unthinkable possibility of an actual nuclear war. Petrov’s basic human essence and character seem to have saved the day, at least in this case.
Just a couple of months later in November 1983, NATO undertook a major military exercise known as Able Archer during a very tense year in U.S.-Soviet relations. President Ronald Reagan had given his “Star Wars” speech the past March, soon after declaring the Soviet Union an evil empire; then, in September, Soviet pilots shot down Korean Air Lines Flight 007 when it mistakenly strayed over Soviet territory, killing everyone on board. The United States was also in the process of preparing to station nuclear-capable Pershing II missiles in Europe, with a very short flight time to Moscow if ever launched.
So, when NATO conducted Able Archer, Soviet leaders worried that it might be used as cover to prepare a very real attack, perhaps with the aim of decapitating the Soviet leadership. At one point in the exercise, NATO forces simulated preparing for a nuclear attack by placing dummy warheads on nuclear-capable aircraft. Soviet intelligence witnessed the preparations but could not tell, of course, that the warheads were fake. Soviet leaders thus “responded” by readying nuclear-capable systems with very real warheads of their own. American intelligence in turn witnessed those preparations—but a savvy U.S. Air Force general, Leonard Perroots, realized what was occurring and recommended to superiors that the United States should not respond by placing real warheads on its own systems. Whether doing so would have provoked one side or the other to launch a preemptive strike is anyone’s guess; however, the proximity of the weapons to each other, and mutual fears of a decapitating surprise attack, would have made any such situation extremely fraught.
Would AI have done better?
In all three cases, AI might have elected to start a nuclear war. During the Cuban missile crisis, American officials considered the Western Hemisphere to be a sanctuary from hostile powers, and the consensus view was strongly in favor of preventing any Soviet, or communist, encroachment. The year before, the United States through the CIA had attempted to work with Cuban exiles to overthrow Castro. Certainly, the positioning of Soviet nuclear weapons less than 100 miles from U.S. shores triggered prevalent American thinking about what was and was not acceptable. Since no sensors could determine the absence of Soviet nuclear warheads, a “cautious” approach based on the doctrine of the day would indeed have been to eliminate those Soviet capabilities before they could be made operational. Only a very real American president—one who had heightened cautionary instincts after witnessing combat in World War II and watching the U.S. bureaucracy make a mess out of the Bay of Pigs attack on Cuba the year before—thought otherwise. This example shows that the ban on AI starting a nuclear war should include cases in which conventional weapons might be used to strike nuclear-capable weapons or weapons systems.
With the false-warning crisis in September 1983, it took an astute individual to realize the unlikelihood that the United States was attacking with just a few warheads. Indeed, a different officer, or an AI-directed control center, would likely have assessed that the five ICBMs were attempting a decapitation strike against leadership or could otherwise have drawn the wrong conclusion about what was going on. The result might well have been a “retaliatory” strike that was in fact a first strike, and that would have likely produced a very real American nuclear response.
With Able Archer, since American officials knew that they were only conducting an exercise, and knew that the Soviets knew as much, many would have been stunned to see the Soviets put real warheads into firing position. Most might have concluded that the Soviets were using the NATO exercise as a way to dupe NATO officials into lowering their guard as the Soviet Union prepared a very real attack. AI systems trained on the prevailing doctrines and standard procedures of the day would have likely recommended at the very least an American nuclear alert. And since both superpowers had plans for massive first strikes in those days, designed to minimize the other side’s potential for a strong second strike, a situation in which both sides had nuclear weapons on the highest wartime alerts could have been very dangerous.
Yes, it is possible that very good AI might have determined restraint was warranted in these cases—and might do so in a future situation—perhaps even better than some humans would have. AI can be used as a check on human thinking and behavior. But these examples underscore how dangerous it could be to trust a machine to make the most momentous decision in human history. Xi and Biden made the right decision, and future leaders should stand by it.
Author
Michael E. O’HanlonDirector of Research – Foreign Policy, Director – Strobe Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology, Co-Director – Africa Security Initiative, Senior Fellow – Foreign Policy, Strobe Talbott Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology, Philip H. Knight
Read more fromOrder from Chaos
Follow the authorsSubscribed
ABOUT THE FOLLOWING ACCESS TO LLAW’s ALL THINGS NUCLEAR” RELATED MEDIA
There are 7 categories, with the latest addition, (#7) being a Friday weekly roundup of IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) global nuclear news stories. Also included is a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcanic and caldera activity around the world that play an important role in humanity’s lives. The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). The Categories are listed below in their usual order:
- All Things Nuclear
- Nuclear Power
- Nuclear Power Emergencies
- Nuclear War Threats
- Nuclear War
- Yellowstone Caldera & Other Volcanoes (Note: There are threeYellowstone Caldera bonus stories available in today’s Post.)
- IAEA Weekly News (Friday’s only)
Whenever there is an underlined link to a Category media news story, if you press or click on the link provided, you no longer have to cut and paste to your web browser, since this Post’s link will take you directly to the article in your browser.
A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.
TODAY’s NUCLEAR WORLD’s NEWS, Thursday, (02/27/2025)
All Things Nuclear
NEWS
Lightning Round: Very, very skeptical of nuclear power trades, says Jim Cramer – YouTube
YouTube
Lightning Round: Very, very skeptical of nuclear power trades, says Jim Cramer … Stock Market Fall | 5 Things To Keep In Mind Amid The Market Falling …
US nuclear fusion tests prove superconducting magnets repel neutron bombardment
Interesting Engineering
A new research from MIT has resolved a critical concern about superconducting magnets used in nuclear fusion reactors. … With a deep love for all …
New nuclear power plant to feature game-changing technology — here’s what makes it different
The Cool Down
What’s the reward system all about? Once you send back your Take Back Bag full of clothes, you get up to $30 worth of “Trashie Cash.” That’s good …
Nuclear Power
NEWS
The Promise Of Nuclear Energy – Forbes
Forbes
Samuel Gibson is the founder and CEO of Hadron Energy — developing micro nuclear reactors for data centers. getty. Nuclear energy has been …
Italy’s government adopts plan for return to nuclear power – Reuters
Reuters
Italy’s government on Friday adopted a law paving the way for a return to nuclear energy almost 40 years after it was banned by referendum, …
Kairos Power’s reactor plans for Oak Ridge and beyond
Oak Ridger
Kairos Power is working to build test reactors in Oak Ridge this decade. Next decade? Nuclear power plants.
Nuclear Power Emergencies
NEWS
IAEA examines drone debris from Chornobyl NPP strike, avoids naming its origin
The New Voice of Ukraine
… Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) sarcophagus, the organization wrote in its … Ukraine’s State Emergency Service (SES) has repeatedly stated that …
US Army Corps lists 600 “emergency” projects to bypass environmental review – MSN
MSN
Compact eVinci nuclear reactor can power 4,500 homes for 8 years without water. The Brighterside of News. Compact eVinci nuclear reactor can power …
Nuclear War Threats
NEWS
North Korea Says It Performed Cruise Missile Tests, Days After It Vowed to Respond to US Threats
Military.com
… to US Threats. North Korea said it had test-fired strategic cruise missiles to demonstrate its nuclear counter-attack capability, days after…
The threat of nuclear war is greater than ever, but does anyone care? – Substack
Substack
Military planners are having to think the unthinkable following Russian threats to go nuclear in Ukraine and America’s retreat into isolationism.
Ukraine latest: Putin says Russia does not reject peaceful solution to war – Sky News
Sky News
… threats. Sir Keir Starmer signalled this fundamental … Back then, the threat was war – maybe even nuclear annihilation – with the Soviet Union.
Nuclear War
NEWS
How unchecked AI could trigger a nuclear war – Brookings Institution
Brookings Institution
When facing the possibility of nuclear war, human beings exhibit a level of thoughtfulness and compassion that AI might not possess.
North Korea’s Kim says it is duty to be fully ready to use nuclear deterrence, KCNA says
Reuters
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un supervised a test-launch of a strategic cruise missile and ordered full readiness to use nuclear attack capability …
Making Sense of Trump’s Talk of ‘Denuclearization’ – Arms Control Association
Arms Control Association
… war on Putin’s terms: ceding Ukrainian territory seized by Russia … nuclear attack. This approach would only stiffen resistance in Beijing …
Yellowstone Caldera
NEWS
Scientists discover crater movement in Yellowstone supervolcano – MSN
MSN
Scientists investigating the Yellowstone supervolcano have discovered movement deep in the crater, sparking fears the sleeping giant could erupt.
World’s Largest Lithium Deposit Discovered Beneath U.S. Supervolcano – MSN
MSN
… Caldera, an ancient supervolcano straddling the Nevada-Oregon border. … Yellowstone’s Supervolcano Magma Movement Fuels Fears of Catastrophic Eruption …
UNDERGROUND ACTIVITY – PressReader.com
PressReader.com
Could Yellowstone National Park erupt? Scientists are using advanced … But it was a rhyolite eruption that created the Yellowstone Caldera.
IAEA Weekly News
28 February 2025
Read the top news and updates published on IAEA.org this week.
28 February 2025
More than 145 Reports Added to IAEA Incident and Trafficking Database in 2024
In 2024, 147 incidents of illegal or unauthorized activities involving nuclear and other radioactive material were reported to the Incident and Trafficking Database, a number aligned with the historical average. Read more →
27 February 2025
Update 278 – IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine
Two weeks after it was hit by a drone, Ukrainian firefighters are still trying to extinguish smouldering fires within the large structure built over the reactor destroyed in the 1986 Chornobyl nuclear accident, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said today. Read more →
26 February 2025
What are Radiopharmaceuticals?
Radiopharmaceuticals are used in nuclear medicine worldwide. Their applications range from imaging of many different organs, such as brain, heart, kidney and bone, to the treatment of cancer and hyperthyroidism. Read more →
25 February 2025
IAEA Profile: A Woman’s Mission to Advance Nuclear Information Management
Dibuleng Mohlakwana and her team are introducing innovative tools and techniques to improve how the IAEA shares, organizes and makes its collection of nuclear information accessible. Read more →
24 February 2025
How Nuclear and Climate-smart Agriculture Solutions can Help Mitigate Climate Change
The IAEA is helping countries address climate change adaptation by applying nuclear techniques for plant breeding, animal production, food safety, health and insect pest control. Read more →