“End Nuclear Insanity Before Nuclear Insanity Ends Humanity.” ~llaw
Nov 01, 2025
Today’s Image . . .
A sub-surface atomic test is seen at the Nevada test site on March 23, 1955.
US Atomic Energy Commission/AP
LLAW’s All Things Nuclear Review Today . . .
“This was a big week to get more afraid about nuclear weapons” ~CNN
~a well-considered and pertinent opening statement from Today’s CNN article relative to Trump’s order to “immediately resume the testing of nuclear weapons.”
The story also, perhaps with sarcasm, that neither Russia nor the US has actually tested nuclear weapons for 30 years. Trump evidently thinks, wrongly as always, that testing missiles, bombers, etc. is the same thing as testing nuclear bombs. And quite oddly the Pentagon has taken offense to the movie “A House of Dynamite” because it infers its incompetency — especially the inability to hit an incoming nuclear-armed missile with a defense missile of our own when it is well-known that the difficulty of “hitting a bullet with a bullet” is a long known practical fact.
But the written Pentagon objection to the movie director and producers is something less than presidential or even something that any department of our government would ordinarily do. Such a complaint about a fictional movie is nothing more than childish insecurity. This speaks to the general weakness of Trump and his administration.
But the point of the difference between testing nuclear warheads versus testing nuclear warhead transportation is the issue that simply went right over Trump’s head and here we are — planning to restart the the problem that no one on planet Earth with a sound mind other than Trump with his demented mind would even consider . . . ~llaw
Today’s Feature Story from LLAW’s NUCLEAR WORLD TODAY is from category. . .
Nuclear Power
NEWS
Why is there so much talk about nuclear weapons this week?
Analysis by
5 hr ago
A sub-surface atomic test is seen at the Nevada test site on March 23, 1955.
US Atomic Energy Commission/AP
Follow
This was a big week to get more afraid about nuclear weapons.
Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the testing of a new nuclear-capable missile.
President Donald Trump responded by calling for the US to resume the testing of nuclear weapons.
Neither country has tested nuclear weapons since the ‘90s, and Russia was quick to clarify that Putin did not announce new nuclear testing. During a trip to Asia, Trump did not meet with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, who has rejected demands that his country denuclearize.
North Korea is one potential villain in a fictional movie about nuclear war on Netflix, Kathryn Bigelow’s “A House of Dynamite.” It is a “Rashomon”-style thriller about the concept of mutually assured destruction that the filmmakers mean to be a wakeup call for nuclear powers.
The Pentagon felt the need to draw up a memo responding to the film’s depiction of US missile defense systems as inherently flawed – like “trying to hit a bullet with a bullet” is the line repeated throughout the movie.
The film’s writer, Noah Oppenheim, told CNN’s Jake Tapper that he welcomes the criticism, since the movie’s intention was “to invite a conversation about an issue which we think is tremendously important and doesn’t get enough attention, which is the fact that we have all these nuclear weapons that exist in the world and that pose a great threat to all mankind.”
‘Claim is preposterous’: Producer pushes back on Pentagon’s criticism of Netflix’s nuclear thriller
3:55
There’s more talk of nuclear weapons to come. A treaty between the US and Russia to limit the size of nuclear arsenals expires in February and there’s currently no movement to extend it.
The Trump administration’s strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities set back its nuclear capabilities, but likely did not completely destroy them.
There’s new tension this week between India and Pakistan, both nuclear powers.
I went back to Matthew Fuhrmann, a professor at Texas A&M University who has written extensively about nuclear weapons and disarmament, including in the books “Influence Without Arms: The New Logic of Nuclear Deterrence” and “Nuclear Weapons and Coercive Diplomacy” with Todd S. Sechser. We last talked around the time of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, when nuclear threats were also in the news.
Our conversation about the developments this week, conducted by email and edited for length and style, is below:
What do Putin and Trump mean by ‘nuclear test’?
WOLF: Both Trump and Putin referred to nuclear tests this week, but neither the US nor Russia is supposed to have tested nuclear weapons since the ‘90s. What did you make of Russia’s test and the US response? Is this the kind of coercive diplomacy you’ve written about or something else?
FUHRMANN: It’s firstly important to clarify what we mean by a “nuclear test.” Russia has tested missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons. But, in the traditional sense, a nuclear test is a denotation of a nuclear explosive device. Think of the July 1945 Trinity test in the New Mexico desert that you may have seen depicted in the 2023 film “Oppenheimer” (although after the signing of the Limited Test Ban Treaty in 1963, most nuclear explosive tests were done underground rather than in the atmosphere). This is not what Russia has done, and I don’t believe this is what the US is threatening to resume, either.
There are two main reasons why countries test military technologies. The first is to see whether a weapon works as designed. The second is to send a political message to other countries. I think there’s a certain amount of signaling attached to Russia’s recent missile tests. Although it’s difficult to decipher Moscow’s intentions, in testing these technologies, the Kremlin may be implicitly saying to the United States and NATO: Back off in Ukraine — look what we might do if you continue to interfere.
More worried about a nuclear crisis today than four years ago
WOLF: Do you generally think the threat of a nuclear standoff has increased in recent years?
FUHRMANN: I’m more worried about the possibility of a serious nuclear crisis today than I was at the end of 2021. This is in large part because of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and the possibility that Moscow may continue to brandish its nuclear arsenal to help it prevail in that war. But it’s not just that. The possibility of a US-China nuclear standoff over Taiwan is not trivial, especially if one side misinterprets the other’s resolve to fight. North Korea’s nuclear capabilities are expanding too, and there is the potential for disaster on the Korean Peninsula arising from an accident or miscalculation. Not to mention the perennial possibility of a nuclear-tinged crisis between India and Pakistan. This doesn’t mean that the probability of a standoff is high. Actually, I still think it’s relatively low. But given the stakes involved, even a small increase in the risk — say, 2% — is cause for concern.
Do US missile defenses work?
WOLF: Coincidentally, there’s a movie on Netflix about the 30 minutes it would take for an intercontinental ballistic missile to reach the US and the difficulty of intercepting such a missile. The Pentagon felt the need to produce a memo responding to the film. Are missile defense systems any better than the coin toss suggested by the movie?
FUHRMANN: I haven’t seen the movie yet. I’ll leave that question to technical experts who understand the intricacies of missile defense systems better than I do. I will say that, from a strategic standpoint, there’s value in convincing your adversaries that your missile defense systems are impenetrable. This can strengthen deterrence: If adversaries believe their missiles won’t get through, they may be less likely to fire them.
Would Trump’s Golden Dome solve the nuclear threat?
WOLF: Trump (taking cues from Project 2025) has called for a new “Golden Dome” missile defense shield. Is it worth the cost and would that do anything to solve the nuclear threat?
FUHRMANN: That’s a complicated question. On the surface, missile defense sounds great – and in some ways it is. Consider, for example, the relatively high rate at which Israel successfully shot down missiles fired by Iran in their war over the summer. However, in the long run, developing these systems can encourage your adversaries to develop technologies that circumvent your defenses, or to develop missile defenses of their own. In the end, you may get a costly arms race that leaves both sides worse off. The United States and the Soviet Union recognized this during the Cold War, which is one reason they agreed to the 1972 Antiballistic Missile Treaty.
Will the expiring Obama-era nuclear treaty be renegotiated?
WOLF: The US and Russia have a nuclear arms treaty that expires in February. New START, negotiated during the Obama administration, limits the size of the countries’ nuclear stockpiles. Will it be renegotiated?
FUHRMANN: The prospects currently look bleak. As long as there is tension over the war in Ukraine, it’s hard to imagine Russia agreeing to a new arms control deal with the United States. If that tension is alleviated, the prospects for a deal would improve.
What about China?
WOLF: Should China or other countries be a part of that process?
FUHRMANN: Many US policymakers would like to include China as part of an arms control deal with Russia. The problem is that China’s nuclear capabilities currently lag behind Russia and the United States. Countries usually don’t like to negotiate from a position of weakness. As China’s nuclear arsenal expands — a trend that is happening — a trilateral deal becomes more likely, especially if Beijing achieves parity with the other two countries.
Bring back the test ban treaty?
WOLF: Bill Clinton helped negotiate the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in the 1990s but failed to get the US Senate to ratify it. Trump isn’t talking about reviving it, but if he could get the handful of nuclear powers that have likewise not ratified the test ban treaty — including China, Russia, North Korea, India, Pakistan and Israel — to ratify it, would he be a shoo-in for the Nobel Peace Prize?
FUHRMANN: The US Senate vote on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in 1999 was a setback for global nonproliferation. There are obstacles to bringing the CTBT into force in the current political environment. If the Trump administration was able to get this done, it would be a major foreign policy achievement.
TODAY’s LLAW;s NUCLEAR WORLD NEWS
About Today’s Nuclear News and How it Works:
There are 7 categories, including a bonus non-nuclear category for news about the Yellowstone caldera and other volcano and caldera activity around the world that also play an important role in the survival of human and other life.
The feature categories provide articles and information about ‘all things nuclear’ for you to pick from, usually with up to 3 links with headlines concerning the most important media stories in each category, but sometimes fewer and occasionally even none (especially so with the Yellowstone Caldera). If there was no news from a Category today, the Category will not appear. The Categories are listed below in their usual order:
- All Things Nuclear
- Nuclear Power
- Nuclear Power Emergencies
- Nuclear War Threats
- Nuclear War
- Yellowstone Caldera
- IAEA News (Friday’s only)
A current Digest of major nuclear media headlines with automated links is listed below by nuclear Category (in the above listed order). If a Category heading does not appear in the daily news Digest, it means there was no news reported from this Category today. Generally, the three best articles in each Category from around the nuclear world(s) are Posted. Occasionally, if a Post is important enough, it may be listed in multiple Categories.
Nuclear World News for Saturday, (11/01/2025)
All Things Nuclear
NEWS
Trump says he wants to resume nuclear testing. Here’s what that would mean
WCMU Public Radio
President Trump said Thursday that the U.S. would begin testing nuclear weapons again for the first time in decades … All Things Considered …
The nuclear arms race is like two sworn enemies standing waist deep in gasoline, one with … – Instagram
Why is there so much talk about nuclear weapons this week? | CNN Politics
CNN
… all these nuclear weapons that exist in the world and that pose a great threat to all mankind.” A House of Dynamite. (L-R) Anthony Ramos as Major …
President Trump says he wants to resume nuclear testing – WVTF
WVTF
Donate. Radio IQ. All Things Considered. Radio IQ. All Things Considered. Next Up: 6:00 PM Marketplace. 0:00. 0:00. All Things Considered. Radio IQ. 0 …
Nuclear Power
NEWS
Trump orders nuclear weapons testing to begin immediately on equal basisuclear … – Fox News
Fox News
… nuclear–powered weapon delivery systems, like ballistic and cruise missiles. Correll said that since neither China nor Russia has conducted a nuclear …
Trump says he wants to resume nuclear testing. Here’s why experts are confused – CNN
CNN
In the wake of Russian President Vladimir Putin bragging about his country testing both a nuclear–powered torpedo and a new cruise missile, …
Is the world back to testing nuclear weapons? Here are the facts | CBC News
CBC
Last week, Russia tested a nuclear–powered missile, but did not detonate an actual bomb. In response, President Donald Trump said this week the U.S. …
Nuclear Power Emergencies
NEWS
Chester County highlights emergency management services, encourages ReadyChesco signups
Citizen Portal AI
He also noted the county plans for technological hazards, including two nuclear power plants that affect Chester County. For residents …
Nuclear War Threats
NEWS
Trump wants to resume US nuclear weapons testing. This is what it could look like
ABC News
… nuclear threats were on the rise. How nuclear weapons are tested … The threat of nuclear war seemed to end with the Cold War, but in 2024 …
Donald Trump’s alarming muddle about nuclear-weapons testing – The Economist
The Economist
This fictional fog of nuclear war is … And Russia’s nuclear threats have limited the military assistance that the West has provided Ukraine.
Clip: Trump’s trade deals in Asia and threats to resume nuclear testing – PBS
PBS
Clip: Trump’s trade deals in Asia and threats to resume nuclear testing … And the fact is they got a truce in the trade war, but it’s a trade war …
Nuclear War
NEWS
Trump wants to resume US nuclear weapons testing. This is what it could look like
ABC News
Nearly all of the hard-won treaties that constrained nuclear weapons since the end of the Cold War have been abrogated, he added. The last remaining …
Why is there so much talk about nuclear weapons this week? | CNN Politics
CNN
… nuclear arsenal to help it prevail in that war. But it’s not just that. The possibility of a US-China nuclear standoff over Taiwan is not trivial …
Putin Brandishes Menacing Nuclear Weapons as Talks With U.S. Falter
The New York Times
… War, when the Soviet Union regularly emphasized that for the world’s … 21 of the Burevestnik, a low-flying, nuclear-propelled Russian cruise missile .